09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> irony is that it is Ali who taught us that even the greats are<br />

beatable on any given night, and I'll try and explain it this way. Tell me this:<br />

who would have won out of Henry Cooper and <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> ? Be fair now. <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

would have been too strong and too busy (although both he and Cooper would have<br />

cut up badly in a frantic fight). Now go back in time and remember the<br />

Clay v Cooper fight. Cooper put Clay down almost for the count. <strong>The</strong> difference<br />

between a loss and a win for Clay was probably Angelo Dundee's probing thumb and<br />

a glove tear.So I ask you this: if Cooper all but beat Clay, then why is<br />

it so unbelievable that <strong>Jerry</strong> could have done the same thing ? Lightning does<br />

strike, you know. Ask Joe Louis.I'd like to add something else. Many<br />

people accuse Ali of getting favouritism from judges etc, in his second career.<br />

Perhaps that was the case, as there were questionable decisions (even though<br />

close title fights traditionally go to champs).But people forget that<br />

Ali in his first career - as Clay - was hated by the establishment, including<br />

the judges, and the influential media. It is a credit to Clay that he never<br />

allowed his fights to be dictated by shonky judges. He took the result out of<br />

their hands by winning easily. And it wasn't like he was fighting bums.<br />

Whether critics like or admire Ali or not, the undeniable truth is that<br />

he had probably the most remarkable career in boxing history. It had everything.<br />

Controversy in and out of the ring. Politics and defiance of authorities.<br />

Charges and court hearings. Show downs in exotic places all round the world. His<br />

fights became world events. Boxing today still has wind in its sails from the<br />

Ali era.|<br />

|8/14/04 07:04:14 PM|Ernie Laxalt|Reno, NV||elax66@aol.com||||10|Hahaha, you<br />

guys crack me up, and I mean that in a nice way. No, I gave up drinking back in<br />

'82. Jimmy, yes, any really good heavyweight boxer -- and JQ was a great one, no<br />

doubt about it -- could conceivably beat any other on a given night. <strong>The</strong> proof<br />

of that is that every once in a while there's a huge upset, like Buster Douglas<br />

beating Tyson or Leon Spinks beating Ali. But that's only one one hundredth of<br />

one percent of the time. 98% of the time, there is a pretty consistent order to<br />

things in boxing, and we can usually tell what fights will be close, which ones<br />

someone is pretty sure to win, etc. Now <strong>Jerry</strong> had how many title fights? 4? 5?<br />

He didn't win. That means something serious, friends. We cannot truly call him a<br />

champion. In some ways he was great, like a champ -- in his heart, his punch,<br />

his killer instinct, his will to win, his left hook. But I argue that's really<br />

all we can say. Now there are certain matchups where <strong>Jerry</strong> was probably closer<br />

to winning, even against guys he did not beat. Norton and Holmes were good<br />

opportunities for him -- these were guys he could knock out. I don't think so<br />

about Liston, Ali, Frazier and Foreman. Yes, it's possible, but not very likely.<br />

Now my real point is that by indulging all our speculations as far as we<br />

want, with no discipline, we are not learning anything, we are not exchanging<br />

real information, we are not exploring facts or real hypotheses or theories. All<br />

we're doing is pushing peas around on the plate, as they say down South. I<br />

compared it to masturbation. As far as my World War Two analogy, I wanted to<br />

give you an example that was absurd and similar. It's not history to investigate<br />

what would have happened if the Germans had repelled the Allied invasion of<br />

Normandy, and it's not history to investigate whether <strong>Quarry</strong> would have beaten<br />

Ali if <strong>Quarry</strong> did not get cut. I don't man to be rude, but it seems like a waste<br />

of time, and doubly so, because it's been said here so many times. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

so many other things about heavyweight boxing from the days of Jim Jeffreys on<br />

that we could talk about. I suggest we move onto new ground. For example, I'd be<br />

interested in what happened to guys <strong>Jerry</strong> beat. Specifically, I'd like to figure<br />

out if the experience of being KOed or soundly beaten by <strong>Jerry</strong> got many guys out<br />

of boxing, either right away or after just a few more fights. It seems to me<br />

that it would, but I don't know. Does anyone? My brothers were all brawlers,<br />

Massimo, and I was the fast one, the one with footwork. <strong>The</strong>y are all fat couch<br />

potatoes now. (Meaning: mostly what they do is sit around drinking beer and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!