09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

his best, was famous for. It was called a "sneaky right" that caught many an<br />

opponent by surprise and it is what put down Oscar Bonevean twice when he fought<br />

Ellis. Joe started smokin big time in the sixth round and he wore Ellis<br />

down on the way to a ninth round stoppage win for a TKO. I haven't seen<br />

the scoring on the fight but it wouldn't surprise me if Ellis still had a slight<br />

lead at the end of the fight or maybe the scorecards were even, he had built up<br />

such an early lead. <strong>The</strong>re could have been some 10 to 8 rounds for Frazier in<br />

the later rounds though.Also, Ellis was a harder puncher than Young and<br />

I am not sure why people paint him as having no punch at all. Bonevena knew he<br />

could punch and Shavers knows it too as Ellis almost had Earnie out on his feet<br />

from punches of his own before Shavers landed the tremendous right uppercut out<br />

of nowhere. If Ellis lands two or three more punches and Shavers doesn't land<br />

the uppercut, we would have had Shavers as the first round knockout victim.|<br />

|3/18/05 06:00:46 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|SteveI agree with you about<br />

women boxers. My view is best put this way. If I was ever lucky enough to be in<br />

the ring with say, Anna Nicole Smith, my priority wouldn't be punching her in<br />

the chest. I'm not suggesting that Joe was ducking her, though. |<br />

|3/18/05 06:41:54 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Kent, let me<br />

get this straight. You're now saying that Frazier fought Ellis the second time<br />

around because Ellis had one last great fight left in him. You're saying it<br />

wasn't because Ellis was less of a risk than Lyle or Shavers or Mac Foster or<br />

Young.I can just imagine the pre-fight discussions. Yank: "Joe, Jimmy<br />

might not have won any of his last four fights, he might have lost to Lyle and<br />

Shavers, and you might have beaten him easily last time, but I think he's got<br />

one last great fight left in him and, although he's more of a risk than the<br />

Acorn and Lyle, he's the better tune up for you. Let's chance it with that<br />

scamboogah."Or, Yank: "You beat Ellis easily last time. He's completely<br />

shot now. If we take the fight to the other side of the planet, in some place<br />

called Malburne, maybe we can sell some tickets to it. It's either that or<br />

putting you in with Lyle or Shavers or Foster or Young or some other guy who is<br />

actually breathing without life support." Kent, by the time Frazier<br />

fought him the second time, Ellis was a hall-of-famer in the Dead Parrot<br />

Society. He'd been admitted years earlier and there were portraits of him<br />

hanging on their meeting room wall. It wasn't meant to be a fight; Joe was<br />

looking for a guy ready for a post mortem and he found one in Ellis.<br />

Period.Yet you Dead Parroters are sticking to your silly beliefs about<br />

Joe not ducking anyone. You're as outdated as that Japanese soldier wandering<br />

aimlessly around the jungles of Bornea thinking that the wars still<br />

going.Setting you guys straight is almost becoming a full time career<br />

for me. Gerri, Forest, what are you guys doing ? Kent needs some help here. |<br />

|3/18/05 07:46:22 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|You are right<br />

Howard going into their second fight Ellis seemed like a safer opponent then<br />

Lyle, Foster, or Shavers but as it turned out, Ellis, a former heavyweight<br />

champion, something none of those other fighters can claim, fought very well. I<br />

was just saying, anything can happen in any fight and it turned out to be not as<br />

safe for Joe as it seemed beforehand.Howard, you seem stuck in the<br />

"either or" mentality. <strong>The</strong>re are more possibilities or varibles in a fight (and<br />

in an intellitual argument also) than one way or the other, that just because<br />

one thing is true doesn't always mean something else has to be false. That just<br />

because Ellis appeared to be a very safe opponent going in doesn't mean the<br />

fight turned out that way. Ellis won the first five rounds by boxing well but<br />

eventually Joe caught up to him.I am just pointing out other<br />

possiblities than the conclusions you come up with.Howard, have you ever<br />

heard of a tune up fight taken because of similar styles to the fight someone is<br />

preparing for? That is what the second Ellis fight was intended for, to keep<br />

Joe sharp as he waited for Ali.I also can't see why you are not open to<br />

the possibility of Lyle, who got a title shot before Joe, not taking a possible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!