09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

|8/6/03 02:26:44 AM|Massimo|Rome||Massimo.Cini@roma2.infn.it||||10|David<br />

TuavsMike Tyson: this one would be awar !!!! But, at the end of the night,<br />

the winnerwould be David ( KO 4). Tua can hit every bitas hard as Tyson<br />

and when he does it youhave no choice.... You have to go !!!!! This<br />

onewould be like Foreman-Lyle !!!!!|<br />

|8/6/03 04:58:49 AM|uno|usa||yahoo.com||||9| hey dan, cooney had a glass jaw and<br />

lewis a not so stong chin, the shot he got with ,against rahman and macall would<br />

have taken down whole house down , never mind the fact that rahamn and macalls<br />

skills are a little bit limited in there arsanel|<br />

|8/6/03 05:07:05 AM|Paul|Sydney, Australia||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Dan, a wise man<br />

once said that sensible people never argue with a fool, but here I am responding<br />

to your posts. Neither Ward or John need me supporting them,particularly when it<br />

only involves a battle of wits with you. <strong>The</strong> reason I posted about you is<br />

because your attitude is offensive. Because Ward had the gall to disagree with<br />

you, you told him that you only read his post because you "once again need a<br />

laugh." You said something similar to John. And then you demeaned the rest of us<br />

when you commented about the "trumped up truth presented here" on this site.<br />

Further, Dan, your use of words suggests that you have a superior intellect to<br />

the rest of us (for example, you accused Ward of not having a "generic<br />

understanding" of boxing). Frankly, people that have the need to demean others<br />

by writing in the superior tone that you use are usually insecure little<br />

upstarts. |<br />

|8/6/03 07:20:09 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|TO DAN: I am not a<br />

"Cooney hater". I respect any man who gets in the ring and gives it his all. I<br />

just can't understand why we can't assess Cooney for what he was: a big strong<br />

guy with a very good left hook , mediocre technical skills and a glass jaw. I<br />

never once claimed Chuvalo was great or even near great. I respect him for what<br />

he was: a very game, strong, incredible durable and brave guy who fought some of<br />

the best ever. Neither man was championship material. As for Lewis having a<br />

glass jaw, I must disagree. It is his weakest point as a fighter, but I never<br />

said Lewis was a great one. He would be in the bottom of my top 15 list (if I<br />

had one). I think Holmes would have taken Lewis to shool. He was a shade faster,<br />

I think hit harder, and was a lot meaner.|<br />

|8/6/03 11:04:21 AM|Massimo|Rome||Massimo.Cini@roma2.infn.it||||10|Chuvalo was<br />

an excellent fighter ! He hadgood power, the best chin of all times and gave<br />

Ali' two tough fights. Just for this hedeserves a lot of respect<br />

!!!!!!!!!!|<br />

|8/6/03 12:32:30 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|You got to<br />

admit, Dan sticks by his fighter. He is a dedicated Cooney fan just as most of<br />

us are dedicated <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> fans.I agree that Cooney was a good if<br />

flawed fighter and I agree he was a bonafide contender, but flawed he was. He<br />

did have a monster left hook and he was one punch away from victory in any<br />

fight.I disagee with whoever said Cooney's fight with Holmes was not one<br />

of Hoplmes' tougher defenses. He gave an in prime Holmes a good fight. Someone<br />

lists a lot of Holmes tougher defenses but I think the ones that came between<br />

1978 to 1982 deserve more credit as that was Holmes at his best. For example,<br />

Michael Spinks fought Holmes in 1985 the first time and 1986 the second time.<br />

Those were close fights and although Spinks was given decisions both times,<br />

there is some disagreement about the verdicts, especially the second fight. I<br />

thought Spinks won a narrow victory in the first fight but Holmes won the seocnd<br />

one. Still, Spinks caught Holmes on the way down and I doubt he would have been<br />

as competitive with an in prime Larry Holmes.|<br />

|8/6/03 12:46:27 PM|max hord|fernandina bch,fla||rasluc@msn.com||||10|To Dan:<br />

Hey Dano, Cooney was protected.He did have a good left hook and was strong.I<br />

disagree with the others that say he had a glass jaw.If he did,Holmes can't<br />

punch a lick and we all know better than that.Gerry stood up to Holmes and<br />

landed some good shots too.Cooneys idiot managers just didn't bring him along

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!