09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IS COOL JERRY QUARRY'S SON, JONATHAN, JOINS US ON THIS BOARD AND HE WANTED TO<br />

KNOW WHAT WE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT RECENT FIGHT.I KNOW YOU GUYS ARE AVID<br />

BOXING FANS SO AT LEAST SOME OF YOU MUST HAVE SEEN THAT FIGHT. HOW ABOUT<br />

RESPONDING TO JONATHAN'S COMMENTS. SO FAR I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS.|<br />

|10/15/05 07:00:28 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|I didn't see the Jones v Tarver<br />

fight, but rematches rarely overturn the first fight result. Usually the loser<br />

of the first fight is a bigger loser in the rematch (especially with guys like<br />

Marciano). I wonder whether Jones paid the price for playing games with his<br />

metabolism - moving up and down in weights - perhaps aided by medicinal<br />

substances, that did his body no good.Willard - I don't know of anyone<br />

on this site who doesn't acknowledge that Frazier's win over Ali was his<br />

crowning achievement and well deserved. Joe was great in that fight. However, it<br />

is appropriate to consider the effects that the three years plus out of the ring<br />

had on Ali. Perhaps he should have had another fight under his belt to remove<br />

the ring rust before fighting Joe. My guess is that he probably would have lost<br />

anyway. Let's consider the reverse. Frazier is out of the ring for 3.5<br />

years and Ali wasn't. <strong>The</strong>y fight. Who would win ? Ali would, in my opinion.<br />

And if Ali was never stripped of his title, I don't think Joe would ever<br />

have been the champion. In that event Joe's best wins would have been over<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> or Ellis. <strong>The</strong> Vietnam War, some of us believe, had its effects in many<br />

ways.Something else to consider, too, Williard. That fight against Ali<br />

was not easy for Joe. He spent time in hospital and had 11 months off before<br />

fighting Daniels and Stander - two unranked guys. After a year off Joe needed<br />

two VERY easy tune ups. How would he have coped with over THREE years off<br />

!Well, Ali had 3.5 years off. His tune ups ? October 1970 he fought the<br />

4th ranked <strong>Quarry</strong>. Six weeks later he fought the 3rd ranked Bonavena (I'm using<br />

the Ring's annual rankings). Three months later he fights Frazier, the<br />

champion.So, after 3.5 years off, Ali fought the champion and the 3rd<br />

and 4th ranked guys in the space of only 19 weeks (133 days). Every six weeks he<br />

fought the toughest in the world. He confidently backed his ability and there<br />

were no easy Stander or Daniels type tune ups for him, even after 3.5 years off.<br />

With Ali's career, unlike careers of others, there are only two 'woulda,<br />

coulda, shoulda' type questions. What 'woulda' happened if Ali was never<br />

stripped of his title ? And what 'woulda' happened in a rematch with Foreman ?<br />

|<br />

|10/16/05 03:14:50 PM|Willard|Florida||Larc@aol.com||||10|Frazier didn't duck<br />

anyone. He fought <strong>Quarry</strong> over Lyle because <strong>Quarry</strong> beat Lyle. I don't see the<br />

point of him fighting Norton, because Frazier repeatedly KO'd Norton in<br />

sparring. <strong>The</strong> fight wouldn't be that good. And finally, if Frazier ducks<br />

fighters, why would he go and get whooped by Foreman AGAIN?|<br />

|10/16/05 04:34:30 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|That's a debate that's been had time<br />

and again, Willard, and neither side shifts ground. If we haven't been able to<br />

alter opinions with all the hot air of the debate thus far, it's a waste of<br />

breath trying again. Where some see smoke, others see ducks behind the<br />

smokescreen. |<br />

|10/16/05 06:58:03 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Welcome<br />

Wilard. We've become a tolerant society here with a diversity of views where we<br />

all respect each other. <strong>The</strong>re were rough patches in the past, with all of us<br />

contributing to that situation, but happily we are trying harder to get on. I'm<br />

enjoying it more. You say that Joe had to fight <strong>Quarry</strong> instead of Lyle<br />

because <strong>Jerry</strong> beat Lyle. That rule is too simplistic. Lyle and Shavers beat<br />

Ellis, yet Joe fought Ellis a second time. Sam Wyatt beat Zyglewicz. Joe faced<br />

Zyglewicz, not Wyatt. Jimmy James Rossette beat Doyle. Joe fought Doyle instead.<br />

Zora Folley twice beat Davis. Henry Cooper beat Davis. Joe fought Davis instead<br />

of Cooper and Folley. <strong>The</strong> list grows and suddenly, before our eyes, the rule<br />

becomes the exception. You also say that Frasier cleaned Norton up<br />

sparring and that's why they didn't fight. Joe doesn't use that as an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!