09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

probably accomplished this by slashing military spending to nothing, which is<br />

why a few radical students in Iran were able to humiliate us, a country of 200<br />

million people, with an impotent military thanks to President Carter's neglect.<br />

Also, he left office with double digit inflation, double digit interest rates<br />

and extremely high unemployement---double the rate President Bush is often<br />

criticized for. He was a nice man, but in way over his head. Republican Reagan<br />

got us into a huge deficit by rebuilding our military into the strongest and<br />

best in world history, which ended the cold war and restored our stature. By<br />

cutting taxes, he also rebuilt our economy into a model for the rest of the<br />

world to strive for. Bill Clinton was a very likable man and still is. His<br />

personal baggage, disloyalty to his marriage and lies under oath tarnish his<br />

legacy. Also, he too neglected and seemed to hate the military---the men and<br />

women who risk their lives to protect us. But to his credit, he did get the<br />

budget under control and presided over a huge economic expansion. Granted, guys<br />

like Bill Gates did more than the President to stimulate and grow the economy,<br />

but Clinton's policies didn't hurt. He had his good and bad points. Right now,<br />

after the joke campaigns by Gore and especially Kerry, and the lopsided losses<br />

by guys like Mondale and Dukakis, the Democrats can use a centerist candidate<br />

again. Face it---as popular as Clinton was and with his high approval rating,<br />

even though he had scandal, his VP, Gore, should have easily defeated Bush in<br />

2000. Instead, he barely won the popular vote and lost the electoral vote,<br />

because he's basically a germ. |<br />

|12/1/04 10:34:35 AM|Kent|L.H. Ca||kentallenetc.||||10|Yes, things were<br />

relatively good under Reagan but personally, it was a hard time for me, so<br />

everyone didn't prosper at that time.Acutally, the military budgets<br />

started to increase in the last two years of Carter's term as we had emergencies<br />

in both Iran and a potential conflict with the Soviets, who had invaded<br />

Afghanistan and it was Carter who brought back draft registration of our young<br />

men after Ford had cancelled the process after the end of Vietnam. Carter had<br />

economic problems, such as high inflation as well as the hostage crisis that led<br />

to his defeat for re-election.Carter had allowed the Shah of Iran to<br />

come to the U.S. for cancer treatment, a humanitarian effort to help a long time<br />

U.S. friend and this is what triggered the hostage takeover and although he was<br />

ineffective in getting their release, under Reagan, we had hostages also taken<br />

by forces friendly to Iran but only nine of them instead of sixty or so under<br />

Carter and these nine were held for a longer period than those under Carter.<br />

Reagan got their release by selling military arms to Iran, an enemy of the U.S,<br />

with some of the money being funneled to the Contra rebels of Nicaragua, who had<br />

their funding cutoff by congress. Remember Iran-Contra? If Carter had done<br />

this, he would have been run out of Washington D.C. on a rail.Reagan<br />

seemed like a pleasant likeble person and he, like Clinton, could get away with<br />

certain things because of this. Face it, most of the time the people will not<br />

be too concerned about scandal if the economy seems to be going well. |<br />

|12/1/04 10:35:46 AM|Massimo da Pisa|Roma||4||||10|You guys are just missing the<br />

point ! Bill Clinton is as wilt as Muhammad Ali'... What else to say ? Who cares<br />

about everything else ?Shaq next president !|<br />

|12/1/04 10:38:56 AM|Massimo da Pisa|Roma||4||||10|I meant who cares about<br />

anything else, not everything else !|<br />

|12/1/04 10:43:30 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Any thoughts<br />

on Jirov verses Moorer? <strong>The</strong>y are two former world champions. Jirov, a<br />

champ at crusierweight, virtually retired hot prospect Joe Mesi and gave James<br />

Toney the fight of his life in one of the best fights of 2003. Jirov is a tough<br />

southpaw who always comes to fight.Moorer, who got kayoed in one round<br />

by David Tua and I think, without looking up his record, also has another recent<br />

loss, once beat a near in prime Evander Holyfield for the heavyweight title, not<br />

the Holyfield who lost again recently to Larry Donald. Moorer is trying to make<br />

a comeback. |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!