09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

say is true, he gets enough negative exposure that people won't contribute.<br />

Lets hope people will be careful who they give to on things and check<br />

expense ratios...imo if its a charity nearly 100% should be distributed,<br />

somebody shouldn't be begging money from people and then drawing big salaries.|<br />

|4/13/05 07:29:03 AM|Fan|USA||n/a||||10| Forest, I don't doubt that you have<br />

been told what you've related here. However, before we convict Gerry Cooney<br />

(and his wife) of what are reprehensible criminal offenses, let's check our<br />

facts. I will attempt to do so on this end, if for no other reason than it<br />

seems other posters are willing to condemn Cooney based on no more than what<br />

you've heard. Right off the bat, I would consider motive. I question<br />

whether Gerry is in such dire need of money that he would jeopardize all by<br />

committing the felonies you've ascribed to him. As far as self promotion, I'm<br />

not sure this effort, if it's what drives him, has been successful. When was<br />

the last time you saw Cooney in the public eye? I must also infer that<br />

Larry Holmes and the other fighters and public figures who are involved in FIST<br />

are either Cooney's naive dupes (however, I presume that in their circles, they<br />

would be privy to what you've heard) or are co-conspirators and criminally<br />

liable as well. Frankly, neither interpretation holds water. I will endeavor<br />

to learn more and get back to you. I would close by suggesting that common<br />

decency demands that SOME credible evidence (not rank hearsay) be presented<br />

before slandering the good name of another. |<br />

|4/13/05 09:45:29 AM|Forest Ward|NYC||raymccormack2003@yahoo.com||||10|Fan, you<br />

made a lot of good points. And I hope your are successful in getting to bottom<br />

of this.What Cooney is doing to my knowledge is not a crime. <strong>The</strong>re are a<br />

lot of charities that exist that do not break any laws. But there distribution<br />

of donations are horrible. Look at the scandal with the 9/11 charities not too<br />

long ago. Organizations such as the American Red Cross, the Hollywood telethon,<br />

the Firefighters Union among others were accused of diverting the donations for<br />

other purposes rather than they were intended for, namely, the victims families.<br />

This only became clear when there was such a loud out cry from the media<br />

(especially Bill O'Reilly), that they opened up their books, and then admitted<br />

to their wayward ways. Cooney's ratio of expeneses to charitable donations is<br />

terrible. Regarding Larry Holmes any other celebrities involved in this<br />

cause, they are getting paid to make appearances at Cooney's events. Why should<br />

they complain, and I doubt that Cooney has shown them his books and finacial<br />

statements. This whole matter could be settled if Cooney opened his<br />

books up. Fat chance of that. Cooney does not need the money? Few wealthy people<br />

do not want to make more money, including Cooney. Finally, Cooney craves<br />

attention, this is way of staying in the spotlight, and having people say what a<br />

nice guy he is. Believe me Cooney and his charity are not what they are cracked<br />

up to be.|<br />

|4/13/05 09:54:30 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|I do know<br />

that Gerry Cooney does some good but it is wrong if he is making a lot of money<br />

for doing so. A modest salary would not be a problem though.I hope that<br />

allegations of Cooney, at the least, making more money than he should does not<br />

discourage people from giving to some of the other organizations we have<br />

mentioned. If there is actually a bad apple in the group, it doesn't mean they<br />

all are bad.|<br />

|4/13/05 12:58:43 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|I hope<br />

Forrest's information is wrong---but I suspect that where there's smoke, there<br />

might be fire. So many charities end up top heavy---paying for administrative<br />

fees and salaries, while very little money goes for the actual cause, that it<br />

wouldn't surprise me if what Forrest says is true. On the other hand, I hope<br />

it's just someone with an axe to grind against Cooney, and they are blowing it<br />

out of proportion. From what I've seen of Cooney, he seems sincere. If his<br />

wife draws a salary, even a bit puffed up, I don't mind as long as she's<br />

working. If Cooney charges for personal appearances, again, it doesn't matter,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!