09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to have a Foreman 3 and that Foreman is not going to fight in the future. |<br />

|3/15/05 03:12:45 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Kent, I am<br />

disappointed in you. I know that you try your hardest to be fair and honest<br />

(most of the time, anyways), but you are falling deeper into the hole you have<br />

dug for yourself over Frazier.Not only do Frazier fans dismiss the<br />

fights he ducked by saying, "Oh well, Joe would have beaten them easily anyway",<br />

but you have now begun to try and reconstruct fights he lost. We now<br />

have Kent saying, in reality, that the Foreman victories over Joe were<br />

unconvincing and that if they fought 10 times Joe would have won some of them.<br />

Really ? When Joe fought Foreman he wasn't able to stand up for longer than 45<br />

seconds straight before George knocked him down again and again and again and<br />

again and again and again. SIX TIMES. (By the way, included in that 45<br />

seconds between knock downs, was the 10 second referee count. So, in actual<br />

fact, there was only 35 seconds fight time in between knock downs.)When<br />

Foreman knocked Joe down SIX TIMES in their first fight, Joe (according to his<br />

fans)was in his prime and at the pinnacle of his career after beating Ali. Yet<br />

Foreman knocked down a supposedly in prime and peaked Frazier SIX<br />

TIMES.George wasn't the fastest puncher around. We all recall Ali going<br />

"whoosh, whoosh" as he mimmicked Goegre's punching style before Zaire. George<br />

was a very big puncher, but he wasn't a fast puncher. Why then do Frazier fans<br />

think it ridiculous to say that Mac Foster posed a threat to Joe ? Foster wasn't<br />

a fast puncher either, we know that, however he had power. Enough power to knock<br />

Joe down (remember Bruce and Bonavena) and perhaps knock him out (especially<br />

early when Joe was extremely vulnerable).Kent also notes that Joe never<br />

got to land his famous left hook on Foreman. He does this to try and leave a<br />

doubt in our heads that maybe Joe was a little unlucky against George. Kent<br />

thinks if they'd fought a third time Joe could have turned the tables. Baloney !<br />

How many chances does he want ? What do you expect Foreman to do, if<br />

they fought a third time, Kent ? Stand still and stick his jaw out so that<br />

Frazier can left hook him ? Gimme a break. That's not how it's supposed to work.<br />

And even if Joe lands the hook and George goes down, George more likely<br />

than not gets up before stopping Frazier (again). Foreman managed to get up<br />

after Shavers hit him, right ? Bet your house he gets up after<br />

Frazier.Simple logic, Kent, destroy the various scenarios you suggest<br />

trying to defend Frazier from the justifiable critizism.|<br />

|3/15/05 04:14:25 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Howard C.-Foreman never<br />

fought Shavers, he fought Lyle. I think that the correct English for that is<br />

"Howard C., you're mixing Shavers up with Lyle" or something similar. But I do<br />

believe that Foreman was ahead against Frazier in Kingston at the time of the<br />

stoppage.|<br />

|3/15/05 04:16:20 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Howard C:<br />

It was Lyle who was able to knockdown Foreman, not Shavers. But other than<br />

that, your points are well taken. Foreman would have pole-axed Frazier each and<br />

every time, no matter how often they would fight. You know, both Frazier-<br />

Foreman fights, especially the first one, looked like an adult abusing a small<br />

child. That wouldn't likely change---the third time, the fifth time, the tenth<br />

time they fought. Frazier was helpless against Foreman's size and power. True,<br />

Shavers wouldn't have the height advantage over Frazier that Foreman enjoyed.<br />

True, Lyle wasn't the closer that Foreman was. I don't know if they would beat<br />

Frazier or not---and we'll never know because the fights didn't happen. As for<br />

Norton, I think Joe would have won that one, but again, as Howard C pointed out,<br />

it's a guess, because the fights were never made. Thanks Yank. |<br />

|3/15/05 07:14:16 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|Angelo,I'm glad to<br />

know your not a Frazier hater.I really enjojed that analogy about Frazier being<br />

beating like a small child by an adult.Of course your not trying to belittle<br />

Frazier in any way.At least Frazier had the courage to get back up six<br />

times.What other fighter even had the balls to fight Foreman again.I didn't see

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!