09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

can get out of jail via bail (temporarily, till trial), with a payoff, or by<br />

being found innocent. Being rich and important doesn't hurt on any of those<br />

fronts!|<br />

|12/16/03 12:42:06 PM|charles anderson|ark.||ctjjandfam@aol.com||||10|jerry was<br />

my favorite boxer. i remember reading every article in every boxing publication<br />

i could get my hands on in which he was in. i think in one he stated that boxing<br />

was not his passion. he learned to fight at a very young age. no disrespect<br />

intended,but he had the tools to be world champion, but he did not love the<br />

sport well enough to be champion. iwant to say again, no disrespect, i loved the<br />

guy.|<br />

|12/16/03 01:46:11 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||Kentallenent@aol.com||||10|<strong>Jerry</strong> not of<br />

championship caliber? This is not true as <strong>Jerry</strong> was better than a lot of<br />

fighters who won titles. Not winning the title in an era when your competition<br />

was Ali, Frazier, Foreman, etc. is not something to hang your head in shame.<br />

Realize that six of <strong>Jerry</strong>'s eight losses were to fighters listed in Ring<br />

magazine's top fifty heavyweights of all time (not counting the Cramner fight).<br />

His other two losses were to fighters who were at or near this level as well.<br />

In his original career, <strong>Jerry</strong> never lost to a fighter who was not a champion at<br />

some point in his career or who was not a legitmate long time top ten contender.<br />

HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO POINT THIS OUT TO SOME OF YOU PEOPLE?Did<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> pick himself up after losses and learn from these losses to make a charge<br />

at a title shot again? Yes he did this on no less than three occasions. Just<br />

because he didn't get his third shot doesn't mean he didn't earn it. In fact<br />

George Foreman told <strong>Jerry</strong> at ringside after <strong>Jerry</strong> destroyed (creamed) Shavers,<br />

that <strong>Jerry</strong> had just lost his title shot and this wasn't the nice, jolly Foreman<br />

of today who gives everyone credit. At the time Foreman was the mean, surly<br />

Foreman. Most of the people who have a low opinion of <strong>Jerry</strong>'s ability<br />

have no idea <strong>Jerry</strong> beat fighters of the caliber of Lyle, Shavers, and Patterson.<br />

When I say <strong>Jerry</strong> fought these fighters, they assume <strong>Jerry</strong> lost to them. Of<br />

course, this is not true!|<br />

|12/16/03 03:00:10 PM|Massimo|Rome||4||||10|<strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> morally has been<br />

heavyweight champion ! He just made the mistake of going ( or to go ) into the<br />

ring with a broken back ! He would eat alive Ruiz, Rahman, this<br />

Holyfield...I'd love to see Lewis- <strong>Quarry</strong>|<br />

|12/16/03 03:10:00 PM|Pete|USA||pco@intel||||10|"<strong>Jerry</strong> not of championship<br />

caliber? This is not true as <strong>Jerry</strong> was better than a lot of fighters who won<br />

titles. "(QUOTE)Just to reiterate, <strong>Jerry</strong> was a great heavyweight. He was<br />

well liked & respected by all of us here. He had great heart& courage and will<br />

never be forgotten. But what fighters, who won legitimate titles were not<br />

superior to <strong>Jerry</strong>? I'm not referring to guys like Riddick Bowe, Michael Moorer,<br />

Mike Weaver, Big John Tate, Leon Spinks, Michael Spinks, Trevor Berbick...the<br />

list is endless. Would <strong>Jerry</strong> have taken out Louis, Marciano, Patterson(in his<br />

prime), Liston, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson???|<br />

|12/16/03 04:47:09 PM|Paul|Sydney||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Pete - how can you say<br />

that <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> was not of championship calibre, and then in the next breath<br />

contradict yourself by describing him as a "great heavyweight" ? In my view, the<br />

reverse was true: he was of championship caliber but was not "great" in<br />

comparison with the fighters you identified (Ali, Louis, Marciano. et al). JQ<br />

WAS of championship calibre as demonstrated by his competitiveness in probably<br />

the greatest era of heavyweight boxing. In most other eras he would have won the<br />

title, especially in recent years when there are so many more belts on offer.<br />

And just stop and think for a moment, Pete, by putting yourself in <strong>Jerry</strong>'s<br />

shoes. If you could say that you were competitive in fights against Ali and<br />

Frazier, and that you defeated some of the monsters he bashed up, wouldn't you<br />

feel of championship calibre ? Cheers. |<br />

|12/16/03 05:06:32 PM|Pete|USA||pco@home||||10|PAUL: In my opinion, <strong>Jerry</strong> was a<br />

great heavyweight. He was a major player during the most competitive era of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!