09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

otherwise. I bet Kent even looks like Michael Moore.Kent will now put<br />

some more propaganda out telling us all how he gives to charity, and what a good<br />

guy he is, and he's a famous reporter, and name dropping, etc. We can't wait<br />

(yawn). |<br />

|12/6/04 09:41:01 AM|Kent|same||same||||10|Here we go back into politics again,<br />

but anyway. Howard C. yes congress did threaten to use the war powers act,<br />

threatened only, to have Reagan be foreced to pull the troops out, a mistake on<br />

their part. He could have forced their hand and made them invoke it, then he<br />

would have done more to see the marines did not die in vain. <strong>The</strong> fact is that<br />

he as Commander in Chief did pull them out and he shares the blame with the<br />

congress of the time. My point entirely, that both parties have had their<br />

failures as far as terrorism goes.Did we at that time do enough with our<br />

intelligence network once the marines were home to track down and find and<br />

punish those responsible? Reagan could have bombed their camps or wherever they<br />

held out but I never heard of anything being done about it.Noam, I was<br />

not comparing Reagan to Clinton. I was comparing his failure in the situation<br />

involving the marines in Lebanon with the failures you mentioned about Clinton<br />

involving terrorism, which I agree with.Oh by the way, Limbaugh is a<br />

drug addict fathead, while I am a drug free fathead and Michael Moore is just a<br />

fathead period. I don't know why you imply I support a propogandist like Moore<br />

because I don't.|<br />

|12/6/04 10:33:43 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Add on to my<br />

last post. While I am a democrat, I will repeat here that I haven't voted for<br />

my party's nominee for president since 1992 because we haven't had a candidate I<br />

have liked (although I did vote for Clinton in 92), so the arguing soley along<br />

party lines will not work with me.I also agree that all of those<br />

lunkhead actors and other liberals who say they want to leave the country can<br />

leave if they want and don't let the door hit them on the way out.That<br />

being said, I will continue to be critical of either party when and where it is<br />

needed.I will also say, Reagan had his success against terrorism when he<br />

ordered the bombing of Lybia after an attack in Germany against U.S. interests<br />

and Clinton had his success in dealing with the situation in the Yugoslavian<br />

region, of course not terrorism proper but a military success<br />

nonetheless.I am hoping that W. Bush is succesful in dealing with<br />

terrorism but I still think the answer lies in protecting our own borders more,<br />

no guest worker program or very limited numbers allowed in. So I am hoping the<br />

intelligence bill isn't too watered down.Of course Naom will ignore the<br />

fact that I gave Reagan credit for anything and I anticipated him linking me to<br />

the actors and liberals who I don't agree with most of the time.Yeah,<br />

when I am wearing my reading glasses and my baseball hat, I kind of do look like<br />

Moore but that doesn't mean I support him, again Noam will ignore this fact.|<br />

|12/6/04 12:00:10 PM|kookoo|ny||kookooclock000@yahoo.com||||10|I'm sure that Bin<br />

Laden is so scared of <strong>The</strong> Breck Girl (John Edwards) and the anti war John kerry,<br />

who should be a great president in france!!Whether you agree with bush<br />

or not he will move on the enemy, but what about the enemy within, Liberals that<br />

are trying to undermine everything Bush does, VOTE OR DIE , WHAT A BUNCH OF<br />

FREAKS THE LIBERALS ARE, THATS WHO VOTED FOR KERRY|<br />

|12/6/04 12:01:30 PM|Boxing Fan|Boxing Land||BoxBoxBox||||2|This site is down<br />

the drain. No one to corral the political pundits. Used to be a boxing site<br />

back in the day. Now it's old television characters posting, debates about<br />

Richard Nixon and how wilt everything is. <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> is the name of the site.<br />

I haven't seen anything resembling coherent discussion in months. Maybe I will<br />

add some soon. However, I don't think the interest here is boxing anymore.|<br />

|12/6/04 02:10:03 PM|Noam|---||---||||10|KentYou began the name calling<br />

by calling me a 'fathead', so perhaps you shouldn't try to pre-empt what I might<br />

call you in return. To boxing fan - Gerri keeps throwing political cheap<br />

shots in his boxing posts and he wrote recently where he plans to continue to do

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!