09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

generally conceded to be great, believe it or not. Floyd Patterson lost too much<br />

status from his humiliating defeats to Ali, and his other losses. Chuvalo and<br />

Bonavena were virtually considered "opponents". Foreman lost part of his<br />

reputation in Zaire. Frazier was considered great even in defeat, yes. Norton,<br />

no. <strong>The</strong>re was an earlier cast including Zora Folley, Doug Jones, Eddie Machen,<br />

Cleve ("Big Cat") Williams, Amos ("Big Train") Lincoln, Buster Mathis, King<br />

Fletcher, Thad Spencer, even George ("Scrap Iron") Johnson -- who went 12 rounds<br />

with a young Joe Frazier and lost as decision -- who had many excellent outings<br />

and stayed in the Top 10 or 20, but who fell well short of greatness. Some were<br />

deserving at high ranks, especially Zora, but never got their shots until the<br />

last phase of their careers. <strong>The</strong>re was also a slew of overseas fighters<br />

including Karl Mildenberger, Henry Cooper, Brian London and others who were<br />

built up for Ali and the cable promoters, and he made mincemeat of them all.<br />

Funny how Ali never really learned how to box .. guess he was so gifted,<br />

athletic and smart he never needed to. I also believe Liston and Foreman<br />

were great fighters, but with the way Sonny was owned by the Mob, his real<br />

greatness is unrevealed, so to speak. Perhaps more than anyone, Larry Holmes<br />

proved his greatness again and again and again, and his left jab is the finest<br />

any of us are ever likely to see. Ken Norton was a tremendous fighter, and quite<br />

likely took the 2nd Ali fight in LA, but didn't get the decision. Where,<br />

then, is the greatness? In those days, Rocky Marciano was considered the<br />

paradigm of a great heavyweight, and so was Joe Louis. None of the sportswriters<br />

or commentators of the day would have considered any heavyweights fighting in<br />

the 60s and 70s to be at the Marciano-Louis level. <strong>The</strong> Ezzard Charles-Joe<br />

Walcott era was thought to be truly great. Anyway, do we call the heavyweight<br />

division in the 60s and 70s great because there were so many very good fighters?<br />

I guess that's reasonable. Or is it because the pickin's are so putrid now?<br />

Even then, though, people were groaning and sneering about the rotten state<br />

of boxing, the final decline, etc. <strong>The</strong>refore when we say it now -- and I believe<br />

it is true, now -- it sounds questionable. When Butterball fights, or even David<br />

Tua or Johnny Thunder (sorry to have the name wrong)or even these 2 Russian<br />

brothers, surely Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis and Sonny Liston turn<br />

over in their graves. What do you guys think? I think to make a boxer, you<br />

generally need a pretty desperate kid, a poor kid, someone who's willing to<br />

bleed to make it, and usually one who sees boxing as his only chance. With the<br />

dozens of pro and "amateur" sports now and their huge programs, as well as the<br />

phenomenal sums of money to be made and the worldwide exposure, most kids choose<br />

other sports. In terms of bringing young boxers along, the promoters, managers,<br />

and cable people have completely knuckled under to instant gratification, and<br />

throw fighters into title fights way too early and long before they deserve it.<br />

Obviously, one of the key reasons <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> did so well is that he began<br />

early and served a long apprenticeship with excellent teachers and good<br />

opponents. I may be wrong, but I don't think many American kids get that any<br />

more as they learn to fight and get into the amateurs. Myself, I finally got my<br />

clock convincingly cleaned 37 years ago, so I've been out of the game too long<br />

to know. Can anyone correct me or confirm any of these ideas? Seems like we<br />

always have strong fly to middle divisions, right? By the way, whatever<br />

happened to the kid named Baby Cassius who used to fight at the Olympic<br />

Auditorium around 1966-1970? He had everything he needed to become champ.<br />

Who believes Oscar de la Hoya will prevail against Shane Mosely? I just<br />

can't pick against Oscar. <strong>The</strong>y're perfect examples of what I'm arguing here --<br />

there are no heavyweights nearly as good as Oscar, Shane, Roy, Pernell, James<br />

Toney -- oops, Evander was, in his prime. Take care, guys. |<br />

|8/24/03 12:55:19 PM|Massimo|Rome||3peat.com||||10|To Kent or Gerry: Did Shaq<br />

ever meet Wilt ?What did Wilt think about Shaq ?What does Shaq think<br />

about Wilt ?Thanks !|<br />

|8/24/03 02:44:57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!