09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dishonor. You shouldn't be using a real person's name when you are not him. So,<br />

hence forth, I will call you Dead Parroter - Impersonator (DP-I for short),<br />

unless you come up with a new name, like Oscar or something.Regarding<br />

the jail bird comment. You initially denied any knowledge of this. Now you admit<br />

making a comment you were in jail, but say it was written in jest. Everytime you<br />

get caught out, you say you were only joking. Psst.....DP-I, I think YOU are a<br />

joke.Kent - given Frazier's vulnerability to big punchers, we can't<br />

'deem' him any of those fights against guys he didn't fight. If history has<br />

taught us only one thing, it is that heavyweight fights are<br />

unpredictable.Clay was a huge underdog against Liston but he won. Norton<br />

was huge underdog against Ali...Norton one. Ali and Foreman. Who was the<br />

favourite and who won ? Ali and Spinks. Young and Foreman. Schmelling and Louis.<br />

Frazier and Norton. Frazier and Lyle. Frazier and Shavers. Frazier and Foster.<br />

Frazier and Lewis. (Okay, I'm getting ahead of myself here.)TYSON AND<br />

DOUGLAS.<strong>The</strong> point is, Frazier didn't take those fights. He made the<br />

decision to fights guys he'd already beaten, guys who couldn't punch, and a guy<br />

who'd won one of his last six fights. History can't 'deem' those fights to<br />

Frazier just because his fans want history to do that.Besides, I believe<br />

that Frazier probably would have been stopped or beaten in at least one or two<br />

of those fights. Joe was a slow starter. Just the appetizer for a big puncher<br />

highly motivated.You must realize, Kent, Frazier had THE reputation,<br />

like Ali did. When lesser lights fought them, the lesser light trained much<br />

harder and were much more motivated than they were against fellow 'nobodies'.<br />

And they've got nothing to lose. Everything to gain. Like the title. <strong>The</strong>y can<br />

make their fortune in one night, one fight. Set for life. Little wonder they try<br />

much harder.That's why you get upsets in title fights, especially<br />

against legendary fighters. Lyle might not have been motivated against fighters<br />

X, Y, and Z. But fighting title holder A he will be motivated and probably<br />

scared. A motivated, scared fighter with a huge punch is a HUGE danger. <strong>The</strong> type<br />

of danger Frazier avoided at all costs.How can you guys 'deem' Frazier<br />

fights against the guys he dodged, when history shows that upsets are a dime a<br />

dozen. Frazier wouldn't have beaten all those guys. History teaches us that.<br />

Learn the lesson or maintain your blind ignorance. |<br />

|7/13/05 05:14:13 PM|Angelo|DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|I don't like deeming<br />

fights to anyone either. Larry Holmes is one of my alltime favorite fighters.<br />

He never fought John Tate---no one's fault, because the fight was inevitable if<br />

Tate had beaten Mike Weaver. But Weaver beat him and of course, Holmes beat<br />

Weaver. Still, I don't "deem" Larry Holmes the winner over a contemporary<br />

champion he never met, Tate. Instead, I'll say that I belive Holmes had plenty<br />

of weapons and experience to take Tate, but we don't know for sure. Tate was<br />

looking very strong and very good, beating some decent heavyweights, before<br />

Weaver upset him and took the (WBA) title away. But some of the posts here seem<br />

to dismiss Shavers, Lyle, Young, Foster as not being in Frazier's league. "<strong>The</strong><br />

fights weren't made because these guys weren't ready for Frazier." Baloney.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fights weren't made because they were MORE than ready for Frazier, or at<br />

least they were legitimate threats to throw a wrench in the path to another big<br />

money Frazier-Ali fight. Guys like Ellis and Bugner were nice names, but they<br />

did not represent a viable challenge to Frazier. A 1975 Ellis would be an even<br />

match for a 2003 Christopher Reeve. Yes, I suppose this really was a tune-up<br />

for Frazier heading into the Ali fight. Kent, I respect your explanation that<br />

Ellis was a boxer type, similar to Ali and it was just some work for Frazier to<br />

get ready for Manilla. I wish <strong>Quarry</strong> had taken a tune-up instead of being<br />

forced into the '74 Frazier fight. I stand by my argument that Frazier<br />

shouldn't have been "deemed" worthy of this eliminator. It's funny how we've<br />

heard that after bad losses, other guys had to rebuild their careers and<br />

reputations. Let's not forget that after Foreman stomped on Frazier, Frazier<br />

lost to Ali too. Okay, without rebuilding his own career, suddenly he's thrust

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!