09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

universal lack of interest and if my memory is correct it had the smallest<br />

attendance in heavyweight history. It would have been difficult to get a bet on<br />

because there was so little interest. I just can't understand how that fight<br />

could possibly have been fixed. I don't agree with you on your fixed fight<br />

theory, Massimo.I accept what you say about Lewis and Tyson, though.|<br />

|11/29/05 04:08:11 PM|Paul|Las Vegas||private||||1|Angelo, I first posted on<br />

this site in 1999. And at that time I did leave my Email address. Do you really<br />

expect me to leave it now. I have read many of the posts of the last year.<br />

People are labelled drunks, racists, homosexuals... This is not spirited debate,<br />

it is mean spirited ranting.Noam, where do get your information from?<br />

You don't even know me. And yet you are bad mouthing me. Also, regarding some of<br />

your recent posts. You write that Kenny Norton did not use steroids. How do you<br />

know this? You write that Ali was an overwhelming favorite in the second fight<br />

with Liston. That is not true, Liston was still a favorite in the second fight.<br />

One more thing you and Howard C from my reading past posts are the biggest<br />

demagogues on this site.Kent those names yopu mention were not on this<br />

site in 1999, or 01, 02. <strong>The</strong>y came later proving my point. This site has become<br />

a cesspool with pretending their opinions are facts. And terrible name calling.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that Brenda <strong>Quarry</strong> has threatened to pull the plug on this site proves<br />

my point,|<br />

|11/29/05 04:19:57 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Noam-You're right, I<br />

shouldn't have used the word "fixed" for the second Ali'-Liston fight. What<br />

probably happened was that Liston as soon as he realized he was going to lose<br />

again, he gave up. Every time I see that fight I feel a sense of disappointment.<br />

That was a bad night for boxing. But it wasn't Ali's fault, it was Liston's<br />

fault. |<br />

|11/29/05 05:58:23 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|Massimo, I agree. In my opinion,<br />

Liston's spirit was entirely broken and he was a beaten man and he didn't want<br />

to get up even though he could have.Ali seemed to acknowledge this<br />

himself. After the second fight with Liston, Ali said, "<strong>The</strong> punch jarred him.<br />

But I didn't think I hit him so hard he couldn't get up."According to a<br />

book I have <strong>The</strong> Rough Guide to Muhammad Ali), Liston commented two years after<br />

the fight, "Ali knocked me down with a sharp punch. I was down but not<br />

hurt....Ali is waiting to hit me, the ref can't control him. I have to put one<br />

knee and one glove on the canvass to get up. You know, Ali is a nut. You can<br />

tell what a normal man is going to do, but you can't tell what a nut is going to<br />

do and Ali is a nut."Personally, I think Ali gave Liston an excuse to<br />

quit and he quit. Ali was one of those rare fighters who took more than boxing<br />

skills into the ring. <strong>The</strong> sheer force of his personality not influenced the<br />

mindset of his opponents and probably even a few judges along the way.|<br />

|11/29/05 06:13:06 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|Paul, lighten up. I stated my<br />

opinion that Ken Norton was not using steroids. Without proof to the contrary,<br />

you're only stating your opinion, just like me. Regards the second<br />

Liston fight, you are right. Liston was favourite. Thanks for setting me<br />

straight.Regards bad mouthing you. I wasn't. I was just replying to your<br />

unprovoked attack on me. Suddenly, appearing from nowhere, straight after<br />

someone else tried to start a fight about Ali, you come on making provocative<br />

comments. We can reply, can't we ?And regards demogogues, or whatever<br />

the term was you used. When I've been wrong, I've apologized. Others haven't.<br />

<strong>The</strong> leaders of this site are the <strong>Quarry</strong>s. When they asked us to quieten down and<br />

clean it all up, we did. A month or so ago.Yet although everyone has<br />

been getting along smoothly, you come on to pick a fight. That's why I think<br />

your agenda is to start trouble here again. Hence the ridiculous posts about Ali<br />

from some whacko, but when that didn't start a fight, you come on with your<br />

moralizing. Well, thanks, but no thanks. You can have the last word if you want,<br />

Paul, and knock yourself out doing it, but I'm not going to acknowledge you<br />

further. |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!