09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> parrot was hanging upside down from its perch, unblinking eyes staring<br />

straight ahead, birdseed uneaten in a container, it can't fly, feathers stuck<br />

together with riga mortis (Massimo ?), it's not breathing, no pulse, stone cold<br />

dead, kapput.Anyway the store owner was trying to sell the dead parrot<br />

to some pinhead with cash in his pocket who walked in wanting to buy a live<br />

parrot. <strong>The</strong> store owner kept trying to convince him that the dead parrot was<br />

really alive and was just having an afternoon nap.Well, Kent, the dead<br />

parrot is Joe Frazier after Ali 1, and you and Forest remind me of the store<br />

owner. <strong>The</strong> pinhead with the cash are those still unconvinced about Joe and who<br />

are listening to your excuses. SQUAWK. SQUAWK. SQUAWK.By the way, Kent,<br />

I sincerely hope I have not upset you by mucking around here. I am not taking it<br />

entirely seriously and I hope that you stop doing that. It should be an open<br />

discussion without the tension. It is not personal. You have my best regards. So<br />

does Forest.Steve - yes, I agree about a commission to control boxing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current set up is a joke.|<br />

|3/18/05 02:15:31 AM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|Steve-I agree with Kent and<br />

you that the fight should have been stopped early. If I were the referee, I<br />

would have stopped the fight after that devastating uppercut in the first round<br />

( one of the hardest punches ever thrown in a boxing or even wrestling ring). I<br />

was just saying what I think would have happened if the referee hadn't stopped<br />

the fight after the sixth knockdown. Joe Frazier was the opposite of Clifford<br />

(remember the Tyson-Clifford fight ?) he would have kept getting up over and<br />

over again, that kind of warrior can't accept defeat and this would have been<br />

very dangerous for his life. I'm very happy that Frazier survived the Foreman<br />

fight, obviously !|<br />

|3/18/05 02:19:42 AM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|If I was, not if I were... Sorry<br />

William !|<br />

|3/18/05 02:33:32 AM|Noam|same||same||||10|Though I agree essentialy with what<br />

you say about Frasier, Howard, you can be too cutting in how you say<br />

it.Steve, I agree that it would be a good time to change the subject<br />

away from Frasier and Ali. Female boxing is a good subject, you suggest. Okay.<br />

Where to start......<strong>The</strong> best female fight I ever saw was some girl named<br />

Jacqui getting the you-know-what beaten out of her by some good looking doll<br />

named Laila. <strong>The</strong>ir last names are on the tip of my tongue. Oh, that's<br />

right. Frasier and Ali. Oops !|<br />

|3/18/05 11:22:02 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kent:<br />

Foreman didn't have to risk his undefeated record to prove anything---meanwhile,<br />

after the ridiculous beating Frazier took in the first Foreman fight and his<br />

rematch loss to Ali, and the time in between, he DID need to prove himself to<br />

"be a legend---one of the best ever." You don't prove yourself by taking on<br />

light hitting and washed up Jimmy Ellis, who you cruised through when he was<br />

actually good. Steve: Yes, Jimmy Ellis WAS a good fighter---held the title and<br />

was a very good boxer. By 1975 he was riding a winless streak and was<br />

punchless, and Frazier jumped at the chance to fight him in Melbourne. Also, go<br />

back through the posts---I don't think I've EVER mentioned Bonavena and<br />

certainly, I don't keep reminding everyone about him knocking down Frazier<br />

twice. It's a different poster, but you know what, them's the facts! |<br />

|3/18/05 02:36:49 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Angelo, you<br />

are right, Foreman didn't have to prove himself after he destroyed highly ranked<br />

Chuvalo and highly regarded prospect Boone Kirkman, putting him in line for a<br />

title shot. I was using an analogy showing that there can be more than one<br />

interpretation as to why a figther didn't fight certain fighters. Foreman was<br />

not avoiding M Foster, Lyle, and Shavers before his title shot. He didn't need<br />

to fight them to get his title shot, same as Frazier didn't need to fight them<br />

to get his title shot later on against Ali. Frazier had earned his title shot by<br />

virtue of beating <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> in 1974 after <strong>Quarry</strong> had beaten Lyle, Shavers,<br />

and M Foster.I was showing that Howard's argument was faulty because if

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!