09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

don't think he means any harm. Howard C's comments on Jimmy Ellis are a comic<br />

farce, parody, sarcasm about Jimmy Ellis in 1975, when he was a young man still<br />

fighting---he isn't making fun of a retired fighter with a degenerative brain<br />

condition or other lasting health problems from his time in the ring. <strong>The</strong> joke<br />

is that Ellis was not a "live" fighter in 1975 and yet Frazier's camp picked on<br />

him, of all people (not Shavers, not Young, not Lyle, not anybody who had won in<br />

their last four fights) but no, it was Jimmy Ellis. It's such an extreme<br />

comment to say a coroner was chasing Ellis around with a toe tag---it's just a<br />

joke, nothing to take seriously or get upset about. Again, we're talking about<br />

a 1975 Jimmy Ellis who was handpicked to be whipped by Frazier, not a 2005<br />

suffering Jimmy Ellis.|<br />

|3/22/05 01:33:32 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|By the way,<br />

do we even have any reliable, confirmed reports about Ellis' current condition,<br />

or is this all hearsay?|<br />

|3/22/05 01:50:15 PM|Forest Ward|New York<br />

City||raymccormack2003@yahoo.com||||10|Fan, I am your #1 fan. I always look<br />

forward to reading your posts. <strong>The</strong>y are always sound and reasonable. But,I must<br />

disagree with you regarding Ali Worshipper #2.Worshipper #2, constantly<br />

insults people on this site, especially Kent. Worshipper #2 will apologize<br />

before he attacks Kent. And then in the next sentence heep scorn upon Kent. I<br />

don't buy that routine. First he apologizes, and then he delivers the insult.<br />

That's shallow and insincere. No apologies from me. I find Ali worshipper#2 to<br />

have limited boxing knowledge,and no analytical ability. And that is what<br />

separates the ignorant from the enlightened.Angelo, I spoke to someone<br />

who met Jimmy Ellis at the Boxing HOF, and he is sufferring.|<br />

|3/22/05 02:36:20 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Thanks for<br />

the 'praise' Dead Parrot # 1. When I know that I've upset you, I also know that<br />

I hit the mark with my comments.You are the 'hit and run' guy. Every so<br />

often you visit, make a few negative and insulting remarks, back one guy against<br />

the other, and then, like a coward running off into the night, you disappear<br />

again. Regarding your boxing knowledge, Dead Parrot # 1. You're the guy<br />

saying that it's a world title fight if it's sanctioned by MSG or the New York<br />

State Boxing Commission. Now that we've established your lack of credentials, I<br />

can move on.KentMy comments were satirical, just like the Monty<br />

Python shows some of us were laughing about. That brand of humour takes a<br />

subject, stretches it to its most ridiculous limits, and exposes the likely<br />

truth by doing it. Its a brand of humour some people, for whatever<br />

reasons, don't understand, and I guess you don't.By twisting it to make<br />

it appear that I am ridiculing brain damaged boxers, which I would never do, you<br />

are preciously trying to turn opinion your way SIMPLY BECAUSE YOUR OTHER<br />

ARGUMENTS WEREN'T CUTTING IT ON THE FACTS.By the way, Kent. All of us<br />

here probably give money to charities. I certainly do. Why is it that you<br />

continually feel the need to tell us about what you give ? A month or two ago<br />

you made a big deal about donating money to a former boxer's funeral. Now you<br />

tell us you are donating some more money somewhere else. It's better to give in<br />

silence, Kent, like most of us do. After all, self praise is not praise at all.<br />

Bringing the topic of donations up was completely against the flow. |<br />

|3/22/05 03:40:21 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|<strong>The</strong>re is<br />

another of Dead Parrot # 1's barbs that I should address.Dead parrot<br />

accused me of using a tactic of offering praise for Kent and then immediately<br />

attacking him. Dead parrot doesn't tell me what such a tactic is supposed to<br />

achieve. (Maybe it's a good cop, bad cop, thing in dead parrot's mind, I don't<br />

know.)Any praise I offer Kent is sincere, and so are the critical<br />

remarks. I think being capable of offering both, when warranted, is called being<br />

fair and balanced. I also happen to think that Kent is undoubtedly a very decent<br />

and kind hearted man who, in my opinion, makes fatuous remarks when discussing<br />

his favourite fighter (Frazier).And when those fatuous remarks places

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!