09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

you were implying by saying that Frazier had "smart management" that he avoided<br />

certain fighters thereby preserving his health. If you weren't saying that then<br />

fine. Now you're saying that it was just "smarter management" than Ali's.<br />

Whatever. I agree on both counts.Anyway, all of this is on the record.<br />

<strong>The</strong> facts can't be disputed. <strong>The</strong>re's a common thread to the guys Frazier fought<br />

and didn't fight when he had a choice. He avoided/didn't fight/was kept away<br />

from/didn't face/etc guys who were big punchers, while happy to fight the<br />

feather fisted. (This has become another Monty Python's impasse. We<br />

couldn't say previously that the parrot was dead. <strong>The</strong> parrot was just resting or<br />

holding his breath. Same with Ellis. He wasn't clapped out by 1975. He'd just<br />

been saving himself for Joe. But now we can't say that Joe "ducked" anyone. We<br />

gotta put it in politically correct terms to appease the Dead Parroters. We<br />

gotta say "Joe and Lyle were never in the same ring at the same time", or<br />

"Frazier didn't fight Shavers because they didn't sign contracts to do so", or<br />

"Frazier didn't touch gloves in ring central with Norton because Joe only fought<br />

guys outside his circle of family and friends", etc. Just don't say the 'D'<br />

word. It's unacceptable to Forest.) Anyway, Joe also wouldn't go in the<br />

elimination tournament in 1969 because he said that he could beat all the other<br />

guys and didn't need to prove it and it was an insult that the authorities<br />

wanted him to. (Hey, Kent, we could do away with title fights citing the<br />

"Frazier precedent". Rahman says he's better than Klitchco and could beat him<br />

easily. It'd be an insult to make him prove it, so let's just give Rahman the<br />

title. We could call it 'deeming'. Authorities have deemed the title to Rahman<br />

citing the Frazier precedent.) Joe even fought a clapped out Jimmy Ellis<br />

in Melbourne WHEN ELLIS HADN'T WON HIS PAST FOUR FIGHTS (read 4 fights, Kent,<br />

not 4 years).And Frazier's only title defenses were against Stander and<br />

Daniels. In boxing heavyweight history that would be the weakest defenses ever<br />

made.Forest - you went to many of the Frazier and <strong>Quarry</strong> fights of that<br />

era. Did you go to the Stander and Daniels blockbusters ? Did you bet on Joe in<br />

the second 'fight' against Ellis ? Massive odds, huh. Your house to a cigarette<br />

butt on a Joe victory. You must have been excited watching it.I went to<br />

"boxing records" and couldn't find an entry for Terry Daniels. I found Stander's<br />

record....37 wins and 21 losses. His record before fighting Joe was:May<br />

1972 knocked out by FrazierMarch 1972 won pts 10 against<br />

BoswellFeb 1972 lost to BrooksWOW ! Anyone got it on tape.<br />

|<br />

|6/29/05 08:16:25 PM|angelo|dc||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|House vs. Cigarette<br />

butt? I think I stand a better chance at being struck by a meteor than Ellis<br />

had at beating Frazier in the notorious "Joe's Posse in Aussie" slugfest. I<br />

wonder though, if Joe didn't defend against Stander and Daniels, who else was in<br />

line? I'd have to look at old Ring Magazines---I wonder what other name<br />

fighters were out there who might have been more deserving of a shot at<br />

Frazier's title than this twosome?|<br />

|6/29/05 08:39:08 PM|angelo|dc||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|To clarify, going into<br />

the second fight with Frazier, Jimmy Ellis had only won once in his previous SIX<br />

fights. I believe his record was 1-4-1 heading to Melbourne. He did rebound<br />

after the loss to Frazier though, as he scored an impressive knockout over Carl<br />

Baker. Does anyone here know who Carl Baker is? I think my uncle had a plumber<br />

by that name. I wonder if it's the same guy? |<br />

|6/30/05 04:49:34 AM|Noam|same||same||||10|AngeloOnly three months<br />

before Stander fought Frazier, Stander was beaten by a guy named Brooks. I don't<br />

know his first name but it might have been Mel.Ellis v Frazier (2) in<br />

Melbourne, Australia, was a blockbuster. To those who bought ringside tickets,<br />

however, it was known as "Suckers borne in Melbourne".Instead of that<br />

farce, Frazier should have fought Lyle. Here is Lyle's record in that<br />

period:(March 1, 1975 Frazier beats Ellis in Melbourne)March<br />

1974 Lyle beats Bonavena<strong>July</strong> 1974 Lyle beats EllisSept

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!