09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

athletes in the world! Differences in reflexes of less than a split second ,<br />

make all the difference in perfomance at this level.Which would suggest a very<br />

small difference in the total population overall.<br />

Hey,R.S.,your falling prey to your own accusations of racial stereotyping. I am<br />

a retired ironworker. I worked with native americans from New York frequently.<br />

Aside from having a radically diferent lifestyle and outlook on their future<br />

lives,their skills were no different than the white and black ironworkers.<strong>The</strong>ir<br />

having supperior skills connecting,"high iron",is another racial myth .It's<br />

insulting!! <strong>The</strong> number of native American ironworkers is a small percentage of<br />

the men who have built this country.I would be very interested in the source of<br />

your information as regards any neurological studies that have proved<br />

conclusively that Indians demonstrate better balance,whatever that<br />

means.Also,I'd be fascinated by conclusive proof that American Indians have a<br />

different hip structure,endemic only to Indians,that somehow gives them an<br />

advantage in walking high iron. Working in the air has nothing to do with<br />

balence skills.It is a phycological state of mind that comes with<br />

time,practice,and mentoring from all the tougher,stronger,older guys.Oh,yes,and<br />

also a three year apprenticeship program. If I laid a six inch beam on the<br />

ground,you or any one else could not only walk it , but probably dance on it! If<br />

I take that same beam two hundred feet up in the air, you would freeze and be<br />

unable to take a step.|<br />

|11/26/03 06:52:39 PM|Evren|London||@||||10|Sorry to here that Forest. I wanted<br />

to ask you by the way whether you ever attended <strong>Quarry</strong> fights back in the 1960's<br />

or 1970's or any other major battles that took place then.Evren|<br />

|11/26/03 07:30:15 PM|Mr. B|Sydney||same||||10|Roadscholarette, you are not<br />

responding directly to my points in repudiation of your earlier claims. Your<br />

lack of response must be due either to: 1) Lack of understanding2)<br />

Stubbornness, willful or otherwise3) Insincerity4) Relative ignorance of<br />

research and research techniques5) Combinations of these At any<br />

rate: 1. Please define race. 2. Identify which areas of body<br />

chemistry (e.g. systems, phenomena) and what levels (e.g., cellular, hormonal,<br />

etc.) are not understood or well understood by scientists. 3. If you<br />

are saying one or more areas are not ABSOLUTELY understood -- meaning<br />

completely, perfectly -say so, please. 4. Prove your allegation that<br />

black men are much more likely to be taller than white men. I argue that the<br />

level of height and distribution of levels is closely comparable, with the<br />

exception that there is a statistically insignificant taller group of black men<br />

(probably about 1% of total, from Masai, etc.) 5. Discuss and defend<br />

your assertion that black men are "obviously" better athletes in even one sport.<br />

Kent has shown that an all-star white team is on par with a black one. Also<br />

account for white domination of bowling and thoroughbred riding, where many<br />

blacks also participate. 6. You say you have no need to have a reason<br />

to believe "the obvious", while in fact that's exactly why you believe this<br />

idea, because you perceive it as obvious. You're like a dog chasing his own<br />

tail, then. Several of us have shown this perceived obviousness is anything but<br />

obvious. What is your motive in believing this, then? Statistics can be<br />

a much more complex discipline that most of you friends seem to realize. Even a<br />

longtime boxing fanatic like Roadscholarette has seen only about 15,600 boxers<br />

in her life. (Assuming 10 new ones a week for 52 weeks for 30 years.) (Of<br />

course, at his age, Massimo has seen a million.) This 15,600 is a<br />

minute sample of all the world’s boxers in the last 30 years. <strong>The</strong>refore, you<br />

cannot argue perceptions dependent upon visual samples – it will be unreliable,<br />

invalid, and dependent on vaguely related factors, e.g., how many beers you<br />

drank at the arena that night. Instead of starting from the outside, then, we<br />

must start from the inside and basic principles. One of them is that there is no<br />

such thing as race. Another is that there is no significant difference between<br />

so-called racial groups. Three, for every black champion, we can point to at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!