09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his way and he wanted to prove they could win without him. But there is no way<br />

someone like Wilt Chamberlain should not have been in the game if he was able to<br />

go back in with the championship on the line.|<br />

|6/22/05 11:37:22 AM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|Kent-I think this coach was<br />

a bad ass and a nut at the same time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!|<br />

|6/22/05 02:50:02 PM|Angelo|DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kent: Do you remember<br />

when Scottie Pippen decided not to go in because the coach didn't call his<br />

number to try the game winning shot? What a baby. <strong>The</strong> idea was that the<br />

opponent EXPECTED Pippen to get the ball, so by giving it to Tony Kukoch, the<br />

element of surprise would be on the Bulls side. Instead, Pippen sulked and sat<br />

out. Kukoch still made the shot and the Bulls won, taking Pippen off the hook.<br />

If you ask me, I would have cut his ass after that. |<br />

|6/22/05 04:40:41 PM|Kent|Murrieta, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|What a<br />

selfish player Pippen was. What if Kukoc wasn't open? <strong>The</strong>n the Bulls would<br />

have needed other options. A good team player would have realized the play made<br />

sense. Sure Pippen wanted to take the shot but most of the time the better<br />

coaches like Phil Jackson know what has the best chance of<br />

working.Jackson himself came from the old school, he played for the New<br />

York Knicks under coach Red Holtzmen. <strong>The</strong>y were a lot like the Celtics of the<br />

1960s as everything was for the team and they were quite succesful at it,<br />

winning a couple of championships and they were at or near the finals every<br />

year.Sorry boxing fans but we have some long time basketballs fans here<br />

and every once in a while we drift that way.|<br />

|6/22/05 05:00:57 PM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|Kent-Talking about Wilt is<br />

never a waste of time! Wilt was Wilt, all the rest is in the shadow...|<br />

|6/23/05 01:11:24 AM|Noam|same||same||||10|Hi everyone. I have been away from a<br />

computer for weeks and that's why I haven't emailed. Steve - I picked<br />

Tzysu over Hatton, and I also thought Tyson would beat whats-his-name. How<br />

stupid am I.While off-line, I read a book by Thomas Hauser titled Brutal<br />

Artistry and at page 99 he wrote,"Joe Frazier doesn't get it. For<br />

starters, he doesn't understand that, without Ali, his own career wouldn't have<br />

been as remarkable as it was. Joe was a great fighter. However, fighters are<br />

judged, not by bouts that are easy, but by bouts that are hard. Frazier won the<br />

heavyweight championship in pieces by beating Buster Mathis and Jimmy Ellis<br />

(both of whom lost to Muhammad). After he beat Ali (which was when Joe truly<br />

became champion), his only successful title defences were against Terry Daniels<br />

and Ron Stander. <strong>The</strong>n he got knocked out by George Foreman, who knocked him out<br />

a second time three years later. Take away the three Ali-Frazier fights, two of<br />

which were won by Ali, and what have you got ?"I personally think that<br />

if Ali was not in Frazier's resume, that Joe's career would be thought of in<br />

terms of a Jersey Joe Walcott or similar.|<br />

|6/23/05 08:38:56 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Noam: In<br />

defense of Frazier, you also have Joe's wins against <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>. He beat a<br />

quicker, young JQ and then an older/more powerful JQ who was on an impressive<br />

winning streak. Add to that, Joe's first win over Jimmy Ellis, who was a slick<br />

boxer. Frazier KOed him impressively (<strong>The</strong> second win over Ellis was<br />

meaningless, as Ellis had only won one of his last six fights and the rematch<br />

with Frazier was ridiculous for both fighters.). Hauser might have been better<br />

served to do what WE do: Talk about the Frazier fights that for some reason,<br />

NEVER HAPPENED---the list of power punching contenders of the 60's and 70's who<br />

are missing from his resume. But Hauser's real point is well taken---doesn't<br />

Frazier understand that without Ali, he would be a somewhat forgotten athlete,<br />

known only to boxing purists? Because of Ali, Frazier is a well known ATHLETE<br />

and an icon of his era---known to sports fans in general and not just boxing<br />

fans. Ali made Frazier richer and better known and yet Frazier has this odd<br />

resentment. <strong>The</strong> insults that sold tickets---even the hurtful ones? Joe, it was<br />

only words, and it was 35 years ago. Get over it.|

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!