09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and no religion too,PAN PAN PARAPARAPAN, immagine all the people, living for<br />

today, IUUUUU-UUU, you may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one, I hope<br />

someday you'll join us and the wordl will be as one...Yeah!|<br />

|7/20/05 05:33:40 PM|Fan|Fandom||Fan@Fandom.com||||10|Noam, there are two<br />

different Fans. Now you think Forest is both Fans? Maybe Forest is everyone on<br />

the site except for you. |<br />

|7/20/05 07:56:54 PM|Fan|USA||n/a||||10|Noam, Noam, Noam...am I the only one who<br />

feels this is getting tedious?You quoted me accurately - I asked for a<br />

reference re: whether Ali had in fact "renounced the mythology of the<br />

NOI".But you haven't delivered. Instead, you proffer one author who<br />

claims Ali "retracted" - your words - one facially absurd statement (the one<br />

about the white devils)."Retracting"' a sentence is hardly "renouncing" a<br />

belief system, which is what I requested proof of. <strong>The</strong> NOI mythology (of which<br />

you seem blissfully unaware) is a bit more expansive than the "white devil"<br />

synopsis. <strong>The</strong> volume which you have cited is merely some evidence that Ali<br />

retracted one statement, (that's all one as informed and committed as yourself<br />

could unearth?) which Angelo astutely observed did not approach a turnaround in<br />

his beliefs.Noam, I am not Forest, I am not Fandom, I am not a racist, and I<br />

have to wonder what Steve and Les have done to "earn" the freedom of speech I<br />

thought we Americans all enjoyed, but you have denied me. Please reconsider<br />

your decision!What are you, the Minister of Free Think in your little<br />

world?I note that after berating Forest (whom you apparently see lurking<br />

behind every post) for name calling, you have stooped to just such conduct<br />

yourself. A poor debater and a hypocrite to boot - and now a budding<br />

psychiatrist referring other posters for professional care! I for one think<br />

we've about covered this now. Just remember Noam, if Forest is really out<br />

to get you, you're not paranoid. |<br />

|7/20/05 08:52:21 PM|angelo|dc||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Tony Tucker vs. Chris<br />

Bird?|<br />

|7/20/05 09:02:25 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Forest (oh,<br />

I mean Fan) you really are a goose. Noam provided you with what you wanted and<br />

like the idiot you are you went back on your word. You must really hate Ali to<br />

be filled with such jealousy and resentment.You can't get it through<br />

that thick head of yours that people here who praise Ali for his boxing and are<br />

critical of some of his personal statements are not hero worshippers like you<br />

say. That is Forest shining out of you when you said that.Funny thing,<br />

Forest, you can't forgive Ali for some of the things he said and then retracted<br />

in 1984, then you never mention Frazier bashing women. I guess that's okay with<br />

fools like you.I really have to laugh. You always get it wrong. <strong>The</strong><br />

funniest example of your dumbness on boxing was when you said that Joe didn't<br />

fight big punchers because of smart management. As if fighting with cataracts<br />

and partial sight was somehow "smart". What baloney.Every time you get<br />

pulled back into line you move onto some other subject to make a fool of<br />

yourself again and again and again.Thomas Huaser wrote a book called<br />

Brutal Art on boxing. He quoted Ali retracting the statements that so offend<br />

you. Huaser is a very respected journalist. YOU YOURSELF FOREST HAVE QUOTED<br />

HUASER IN YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS HERE. YOU QUOTED HIM BECAUSE HE WAS<br />

CREDIBLE.But now, because it doesn't suit your purposes, you don't<br />

accept him as credible. Forest, keep posting please. <strong>The</strong> comic relief you<br />

provide is invaluable. I would miss it if you stopped posting. |<br />

|7/20/05 09:41:42 PM|Bob Bumbera|NC||renfbera@aol.com||||10|I agree with you<br />

Fan, this is tedious. Byrd kicks Tuckers ass. Calvin Brock would too.|<br />

|7/20/05 09:50:55 PM|Fan|Fandom||Fan@Fandom.com||||10|Tony Tucker vs Byrd would<br />

be interesting. Tucker however never really proved to me that he could win<br />

coming forward with mean intentions. I think Byrd would probe him enough to get<br />

a 7-5 type decision. Tucker was a good fighter although Byrd is very good in my<br />

book. |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!