09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

But except for that, by the time Shavers was a valuable commodity, Frazier had<br />

faded from the scene.Here is a top ten list I found in a sports almanac<br />

that shows the top ten contenders from Ring Magazine as of <strong>January</strong> 1, 1975:<br />

(champion Muhammad Ali) contenders-1. George Foreman 2. Joe Frazier 3. Ron Lyle<br />

4. Joe Bugner 5. Oscar Bonevena 6. Ken Norton 7. <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> 8. Chuch Wepner 9.<br />

Henry Clark 10. Larry Middleton.No Earnie Shavers on this list? No, he<br />

didn't deserve a ranking at that time.Frazier during the period<br />

preceeding the above rankings fought four fighters on this list, Foreman, Ali,<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong>, and Bugner. He was not taking it easy. Shavers didn't deserve a fight<br />

with Frazier!I can go through all of the people some here say Frazier<br />

avoided and make cases as to why fights didn't happen. Mostly it is the time<br />

periods involved and whether the public was calling for them and for the most<br />

part, the public wasn't calling for them. Just making a general<br />

statement such as Frazier avoided all sluggers without going over the facts of<br />

each case doesn't prove anything.I don't really want to get into a long<br />

drawn out debate about this again but refute my analysis of the Shavers<br />

situation. I don't think anyone can.|<br />

|6/23/05 01:51:56 PM|Joey|Canada||aol||||10|JOE FRAZIER...let's not allow JOE'S<br />

personal gripe with ALI to tarnish his place in boxing history. JOE was one of<br />

the greats, perhaps not the greatest, but certainly one of the greats. He handed<br />

ALI his first defeat(granted ALI took him on too soon and I feel, did not take<br />

the fight very seriously), fought some top notch contenders(QUARRY, CHUVALO,<br />

ELLIS) and lost the title to one of the biggest powerhouses in heavyweight<br />

boxing GEORGE FOREMAN. <strong>The</strong> ALI, FRAZIER, FOREMAN combination made boxing what is<br />

was in the 70's. We wouldn't have had the build up to the full circle with ALI<br />

defeating FOREMAN for the title without FRAZIER defeating ALI, FRAZIER being<br />

defeated by FOREMAN and finally ALI defeating FOREMAN. I don't see how FRAZIER<br />

ducked the top shelf fighters of that era. He fought ALI 3 times, FOREMAN twice,<br />

QUARRY twice. All three beat RON LYLE, ALI beat LISTON twice, ALI & QUARRY both<br />

defeated SHAVERS. Let's not base FRAZIER's career on "THE SUNSHINE SHOWDOWN"<br />

with FOREMAN. |<br />

|6/23/05 02:04:46 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kent, let's<br />

try a different approach then. For arguments sake, I'll give you the point that<br />

Shavers "wasn't worthy" of a fight with FORMER Champion Frazier---and besides,<br />

as you said "the public didn't want it." Were Ron Stander and Terry Daniels<br />

worthy of Championship bouts with CHAMPION Frazier? Were these fights the ones<br />

that "everyone wanted to see?" Was Jimmy Ellis "worthy" in 1974, riding an<br />

insane, nearly winless streak into the "Austraillan Dream Match" with Jupiter<br />

Joe? You're better than F. Lee Bailey at making some nice sounding arguments,<br />

so if somehow, someway, you can show that a guy who was 1-4-1 in six fights<br />

deserved a shot at Frazier more than Shavers did, answer this: Was the public<br />

crying out for Jimmy Ellis-Joe Frazier II., "<strong>The</strong> Rumble Down Under?" Okay, it<br />

was a "tune-up" for Frazier against an Ali clone, we've all heard that. And<br />

there was no Frazier-Norton match because they liked eachother, we've heard that<br />

too. <strong>The</strong>re was no Lyle-Frazier match because, I guess, the timing wasn't right.<br />

Young and Frazier didn't fight because they both loved Philadelphia and<br />

Tastykakes. First, Liston was too old and Frazier was too young, then Frazier<br />

was too young and Liston was too old, just a couple owls who passed in the<br />

night. Jeff Merrit was having a bad hair day. Wilt Chamberlain was a basketball<br />

player, Lucille Ball had a hit TV show and Merv Griffin was gay. And I've<br />

posted before that Fraizer would have lost to Shavers and Lyle---and that was<br />

impulsive. I didn't think it through---it's easy to say Foreman beat Frazier so<br />

any slugger could, but in reality, Frazier WAS an accomplished heavyweight champ<br />

who was durable and who beat some very, very good fighters. So in retrospect, I<br />

might have been wrong to assert that Lyle and Shavers would take him out---but I<br />

stand by the assertion that at least one of these fights probably should have<br />

been made, and that a legacy is incomplete when some bigger names of the era

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!