09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Holmes a competitive fight as did Snipes but to think it was a Gatti-Ward fight<br />

would be misleading. Your prior posts demonstrate a lot of anger toward Cooney<br />

and I'm not quite sure where its coming from. In the Holmes fight, I wish Cooney<br />

had came out and forgot about the 15 rnds and made it into a fight as opposed to<br />

a chess match which he lost. I believe Cooney was never the same fighter again<br />

although he did defeat a 23-1 Eddie Gregg, a 22-6 George Chaplin and a 22-0 Phil<br />

Brown. Cooney was unstable and never the same fighter when he fought Spinks and<br />

Foreman although Foreman states that Cooney had him out but he didn't follow up.<br />

I believe Foreman also became heavyweight champion after his Cooney fight,<br />

ko'ing Moorer. If Eddie Futch stated to Cooney before he died that if Cooney had<br />

let Futch be his trainer, he would have been heavyweight champion of the world.<br />

That I believe. As I believe that if Clancy had had him earlier, Cooney would<br />

have been a better fighter. I believe that Mike Tyson was a great fighter but<br />

he never once got off the canvas to win a fight. Continuing your career after<br />

being ko'd and trying to improve on your mistakes against the<br />

same/similar/better competition as opposed to weaker competition also shows<br />

heart! I don't see Chuvalo fighting comparitive fighters to Cooney after his<br />

losses to good fighters. Chuvalo fought many average .500 fighters and worse to<br />

pad his stats.|<br />

|7/10/03 10:16:37 PM|Paul Maduros|midwest||pama42@yahoo.com||||10|Lets see now<br />

gentlemen, Cooney vs Chuvalo. I guess Chuvalo is a heavy since he was about 208<br />

to 217. Because of the reach and power difference I would choose Cooney. He<br />

could get the punches in first. We miss you James, I never was lucky enough to<br />

meet you. God bless|<br />

|7/11/03 04:15:34 AM|Paul|Sydney, Australia||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Dan: the<br />

reason I asked for opinions on the Mundine v Echols fight in Australia next<br />

month was because I respect the knowledge of posters on this site. You should<br />

too because it can be a forum for learning as well as debate. You mentioned<br />

gleaning knowledge from magazines, trainers, boxers, gyms etc. That's a bit hard<br />

down here as American boxing magazines cost over $20 and none of our gyms have<br />

American fighters who'd know anything about Echols. Anyway, one of the posters<br />

to this site contributes articles to a boxing website and another actually got<br />

into the ring and has practical experience. <strong>The</strong>re is nothing wrong in seeking<br />

their views, is there Dan ? Sometimes it's better to ask and then listen. As far<br />

as Cooney is concerned, while he was fun to watch, he didn't have much<br />

substance. But that is just my opinion. |<br />

|7/11/03 09:53:35 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|Both Victor Valle<br />

and Gil Clancy were fine trainers, but even the most skillled trainer cannot<br />

compensate for a glassjaw (except through carefull matchmaking, which Valle<br />

insisted on). Gil Clancy did work wonders with Cooney from atechnical<br />

standpoint. He never in his career looked better than in his first round against<br />

Foreman and that incudes the Holmes fight. Alas for Gerry, George started to<br />

connect in round two and that was all she wrote. Chuvalo lasted 15 rounds<br />

against Ali in hisprime (twice) does anyone honestly think Cooney could<br />

have? Yes, I am sure Cooney would have landed some good shots early,but when<br />

they had no effect, he would have faded and gone out in about 8 or 9 rounds. He<br />

knew nothing about infighting, something Chuvalo was very good at, nor could<br />

he fight in a clinch. I also wonder how well he would have taken<br />

Chuvalo'sbody punches. Lyle and Norton were both in their 40's when they<br />

fought Cooney. He lost to Foreman and Spinks and Holmes. He reallydefeated<br />

only one top fighter who was still near his prime and that was Jimmy Young. So<br />

the whole myth is based on ONEvictory and a lot of nonsense spread by master<br />

promoters Rappaport and Jones. Valle was the only honest one in the<br />

group.After Foreman ko'd Cooney, he publicly criticised Gil Clancy for not<br />

protecting Gerry better. Cooney fought a pretty durable,C-grade jouryman<br />

fighter named Eddie "<strong>The</strong> Animal" Lopez and could not knock him out, so to think<br />

he would ko ironmanChuvalo is a great leap of faith indeed. Angelo Dundee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!