09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is the greatest fighter ever, but we've pointed out that sometimes,<br />

circumstances got in the way of JQ performing at his best. <strong>The</strong>se aren't<br />

excuses, they're just observations. James <strong>Quarry</strong> wrote on this forum that Ali<br />

had too much for <strong>Jerry</strong>---a little too big and a little too fast. But there's<br />

nothing wrong with us speculating on how the outcome of the fights might have<br />

been different if <strong>Quarry</strong> didn't get a gash near his eye. Why does this bug<br />

people so much? Look, I'll go along with the people who think Tyson would have<br />

prevailed against Danny Williams if he didn't injure his knee. Does this take<br />

anything away from Williams? No, he won the fight fairly and impressively. Is<br />

it making excuses for Tyson? No, it's simply saying that the outcome might have<br />

been different if Tyson's knee didn't tear up in the first round. |<br />

|8/13/04 03:12:17 PM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yaohoo.com||||10|TO ANGELO: No,<br />

Holmes likes money too much and would have fought on and on even after breaking<br />

Rocky's record. He just can't turndown a paycheck.|<br />

|8/13/04 03:14:58 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Both Larry<br />

Holmes verses Michael Spinks fights were close. I thought Spinks had a slight<br />

edge in the first fight based on him landing more punches but again it all boils<br />

down to what the judges liked and in this case they agree with me that Spinks<br />

output was better than Holmes' harder punches. However, the reverse was<br />

the case in the second fight, that Holmes did enough to win back his crown. But<br />

it was still close enough so that a vote for Spinks' case could be made. I had<br />

Holmes winning by two points, which means a switch of two rounds on any of the<br />

close rounds would at least be a draw.Again, people saying the fix was<br />

in is pure speculation with no concrete facts to back it up. <strong>The</strong><br />

jockstrap comment was made by Holmes right after the fight, in the heat of anger<br />

and frustration because he thought he won the fight. He later apologized to<br />

Maricano's family and fans but nobody ever brings that up. I don't believe the<br />

comment had anything to do with the decision in the second fight. Of course it<br />

had nothing to do with the outcome of the first fight as the comment happened<br />

after the fight!|<br />

|8/13/04 04:11:40 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Michele Spinks once said:" I have<br />

never seen myself as the winner of those two fights ". I have read that<br />

somewhere.I have never seen those fights, but what a honest person Michele<br />

is !!|<br />

|8/13/04 04:54:41 PM|Timana|Auckland||kiwi@hotmail.com||||10|My memory has a<br />

defect and thanks to Angelo and Kent for pointing it out. For all these years I<br />

thought Holmes made the 'jockstrap' comment before the fight, but he didn't, and<br />

that puts a different complexion on it. I still thought Holmes did enough to win<br />

that first fight and that Spinks as challenger didn't do enough to take the<br />

title. I agree with Gerry that even if Holmes had won and been 49 blot,<br />

he would have continued on. He still wants to fight today.I've only<br />

heard of one other person called Kent before. I think his name was Kent Clarke.<br />

Unusual. Any connection ? |<br />

|8/13/04 08:03:46 PM|Joe Krause|Chicago||sadmspats@yahoo.com||||10|<strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong><br />

and Ken Norton flip a coin.|<br />

|8/13/04 09:09:16 PM|angelo|dc||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Holmes, had he gone 50-<br />

0, would have good reason to retire unblemished. Once he lost to Spinks, and<br />

the record was not to be, he probably figured why not come back and make as much<br />

money as possible? He gave an in-prime Tyson a couple tough rounds and was<br />

winding up an uppercut to ambush Tyson---the last moments of the fight---Holmes<br />

uppercut punch was thrown with his back to the ropes, his arm got tangled on the<br />

ropes, and Tyson clocked him. It was Holmes trying to end the fight like he did<br />

against Mike Weaver, with an uppercut practically thrown from his ankles, out of<br />

nowhere. But the older Holmes, without a lot of time to train for the fight,<br />

was rusty and miscalculated. To this day, I feel that Holmes would have really<br />

given Tyson fits if he trained harder/longer and had something to really fight<br />

for other than a payday. Holmes, a few years later, gave Holyfield a good fight

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!