09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

you will about the Ali-Norton trilogy. Norton won the first one, and you could<br />

make a case that he should have gotten the nod in the third (I don't agree with<br />

that---thought Ali did enough to defend his title, but would entertain an<br />

argument.) but Ali won the second fight and I don't understand why that point is<br />

really up for debate. He outboxed Norton and seemed to score more points---<br />

controlled the tempo and Norton never hurt him in the second fight---didn't come<br />

close. Of all the close decisions Ali won in his career, why to people debate<br />

Norton #2? Just because Norton fought well in the other two fights? On the<br />

topic of <strong>Jerry</strong>, he did indeed beat Shavers, who took out Norton in one and who<br />

gave Ali all he could handle. He beat Lyle, who KOed Shavers and also fought<br />

well against Ali and Foreman (and was ducked by Frazier and Norton). JQ was in<br />

the thick of the title picture for a good many years and should have gotten a<br />

shot against Foreman. He earned it. Earnie: Will you at least agree that<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong>'s impressive win over Shavers in 1973 should have put him in line for a<br />

title shot? <strong>The</strong> reason we're even talking about what MIGHT have happened in a<br />

Foreman-<strong>Quarry</strong> fight is that the fight, unjustly never took place.As for<br />

Frazier, he was impressive in taking out <strong>Jerry</strong> twice and fighting Ali closely<br />

three times, winning one. He beat a string of good fighters in the 60's. But<br />

no one here should dispute the fact that Foreman made Frazier look ridiculous in<br />

the first fight and soundly beat him in the second (though Joe actually won a<br />

round). Also, Frazier was lucky to avoid Shavers and Lyle and never fought his<br />

friend Norton. That's three top contenders of the 1970's---very natural face-<br />

offs for Frazier that curiously, never happened. It seems to me that if<br />

anything, it's possible that Norton avoided Frazier, but seems clear that<br />

Frazier had little to gain and a lot to lose by facing power punchers like<br />

Shavers and Lyle, especially after Foreman clubbed him and made it look easy.<br />

|<br />

|8/16/04 11:37:00 PM|Gerry|Cleveland||same||||10|I guess I'm in the pro-Frazier<br />

group here. In the space between Ali's suspension and the emergence of Foreman,<br />

he was the best guy out there. He didn't fight alot, but beat some great<br />

fighters as has been listed. Was he better than Ali or Foreman? No. I still give<br />

the guy his due, very courageous man, very successful fighter for being so one-<br />

sided. Would Rocky Marciano have been so successful if he had to fight an Ali?<br />

Frazier may have proved that answer, not likely. |<br />

|8/17/04 02:43:48 AM|Timana|Auckland||kiwi@hotmail.com||||10|In his book,<br />

Frazier didn't cite friendship with Norton for not fighting him. Frazier said<br />

that the fight never happened because the big money was not there for<br />

it.I find that hard to accept. If lack of money was the problem, why did<br />

he fight Daniels and Stander ? Wouldn't have been much loot in that.And<br />

then he fought Joe Bugner....is anyone telling me that there was more money in<br />

fighting Bugner than Norton ? Come on. Frazier then fought two guys he<br />

had already beaten - <strong>Quarry</strong> and Ellis - rather than seeking a risky fight with<br />

Norton. Once again, logic would say that there was more money in the Norton<br />

fight. He was ducking Norton, just like he ducked Lyle and Shavers. Joe<br />

was very damaged property after that first Ali fight. Truth is, he came out of<br />

it worse than Ali and spent more time in hospital and recovering. Personally, I<br />

don't think he ever recovered and that is why he started ducking<br />

guys.Remember too, Frazier thought Foreman would be easy. That was the<br />

only reason he took that fight. <strong>The</strong> second Foreman fight he had to take if he<br />

was ever gonna have credibility again.After the first Ali fight, Joe<br />

fought 10 more times. He lost four of those, being stopped in three.Even<br />

before the Ali fight, Frazier was choosy. He didn't fight Liston, Patterson,<br />

Cooper, or even Ernie Terrell who went 15 rounds with Clay in 1967. Was he<br />

buddies with all these guys too ?Ali foght plenty of friends. Ellis was<br />

in his stable and Dundee was in Ellis's corner the night they fought.In<br />

my opinion, Frazier has been dragged along on the shirt tails of Ali's legend.<br />

Question: If you take Ali out of Frazier's resume, who is the next best

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!