09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|Gerry -Aw,<br />

the Bonavena gay thing was no big deal, though it did bring out the intellectual<br />

riff-raff. <strong>The</strong> article I read may have even been a misprint, who knows? If I had<br />

to guess, I'd say no, but you never know about ~anyone~ else. It is interesting<br />

how people respond to the issue though, whether, OB, Griffith, Lewis, whoever.<br />

Who cares (sheesh)!Eddie Futch said one observation and a couple of<br />

strategies played heavily into Norton's victory over Ali (officially in one,<br />

unoficially, in two). One was to mirror Ali, particularly when he jabbed. <strong>The</strong><br />

second was to not rush him immediately after a landed punch. Something Norton<br />

watched constantly was Ali's face. Probably no top level pro telegraphed punches<br />

like Ali; his face changed dramatically whenever he was ready to punch. Only his<br />

speed allowed him to land anyway.Norton's a stange guy. Never quite<br />

crossed over into greatness, and the fork in the road when he started returning<br />

to normal man status came fast and obviously.|<br />

|2/2/04 11:15:02 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Ali's Super<br />

Bowl commercial was a nice surprise. <strong>The</strong> Champ looked good.<strong>The</strong> recent posts<br />

about Norton might be a bit unfair. As an Ali fan, I of course didn't like<br />

Norton back in the day. He not only broke Ali's jaw, but fought him tough all<br />

three times. And for all the people who thought Norton was "robbed" in the<br />

Yankee Stadium fight, you're hypocrites if you don't think Jimmy Young<br />

outpointed Norton in their "title" fight. But with that said, Norton was far<br />

better than an average heavyweight. His ability to frustrate Ali, demolish<br />

Bobick and take <strong>Jerry</strong> Q. (admittedly a poorly prepared/rushed <strong>Jerry</strong>), have to<br />

rank Norton as being better than average. And his loss to Larry Holmes, while<br />

legitimately a loss, served to show that Norton had the heart of a true<br />

Champion. After the first 6-7 rounds, Norton had no business being in that<br />

fight. But it's amazing that he clawed his way back into it and nearly won.<br />

Shavers pile driving bombs pounded Norton out of the title picture forever, but<br />

Norton's loss to Gerry Cooney was so far after the fact---like Ali losing to<br />

Trevor Berbick. Didn't matter. Norton holds a place as one of the five most<br />

influencial heavies of the period: Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes and Norton go<br />

down as the heavies who made that middle 70's period the best ever. <strong>Jerry</strong> Q.<br />

had the best part of his career late 60's into early 70's, or he would make the<br />

list too. But the five I mentioned held the belts.|<br />

|2/2/04 02:23:18 PM|Paul|Sydney, Australia||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|RS - It is<br />

unfair of you to write that Brenda is "intellectual riff raff" for the comments<br />

she made regarding your propensity for posting unsubstantiated allegations<br />

against well known boxers. Brenda just happens to be one of the hosts to the<br />

site that you use to demean boxers you don't like, and she also happenes to<br />

reflect the views of the majority visiting here. If you haven't got anything<br />

nice to say, RS, then please say nothing at all. <strong>The</strong>re'd be many here who would<br />

not be unhappy if you just went away after all the distasteful comments you've<br />

made against Bonavena, Griffiths, Ali, and Foreman, et al. Maybe if you were<br />

more constructive and postive about others, you'd begin to feel better about<br />

yourself. I think you are deliberately trying to cause trouble. <strong>The</strong> subject had<br />

changed, the spite was gone, people had restarted posting constructive comments,<br />

and then you take the debate back to the gutter again. You are going to kill<br />

this site RS. |<br />

|2/2/04 03:27:40 PM|Paul|Sydney||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Just one more thing, RS -<br />

am I to take it that your comments are based on a magazine that you can't<br />

identify ? That's what you essentially admitted in your last post. And now, as<br />

if to thumb your nose at everyone who expressed annoyance at what you wrote<br />

about Oscar and Emile, you accuse Lennox Lewis of being gay too. Someone came<br />

on a few days ago posting that Emile is a close friend and that your comments<br />

were upsetting. So, instead of apologising, you flippantly repeat your<br />

allegation. <strong>The</strong> icing on the cake is you now call Brenda, one of our hosts,<br />

"intellectual riff raff". |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!