09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and scoring heavily with relatively light hitting, but lots of piling up the<br />

points. For example, watching Young outbox Foreman was amazing. And I watched<br />

Eddie Gregory pitch shutouts, winning just about every round by pure boxing<br />

technique.Muhammad Ali's early fights, with all the speed, jabs and<br />

footwork, were also amazing to witness.But the caveman in me loves watching<br />

someone like Foreman plow through an opponent, intimidate them and drop them in<br />

two rounds. It's why Tyson's fights were so compelling. I have to say, Michael<br />

Spinks was beaten before the bell started the fight. If you watch that "fight"<br />

(all one minute of it), Tyson knocked Spinks out with punches that weren't as<br />

destructive as other people hit Spinks with, and certainly far fewer clean<br />

punches than Holmes or Cooney landed on Spinks. But the fact of the matter is<br />

that Spinks was scared to death of Tyson and in my mind, took a knee early to<br />

avoid being pounded out.Also, before we ban boxing, we should take a closer<br />

look at the "Tough Man" competitions. Has anyone heard of the recent case in<br />

Florida where a 31 year old woman (mother of two) was killed in a match? <strong>The</strong><br />

girl she was fighting was I think younger and more athletic (even though she was<br />

lighter weight). Anyway, I didn't see the fight, but heard about it on two<br />

different radio programs. Apparently, it was a total mismatch and lasted into<br />

the third round. <strong>The</strong> lady was being hit by brutal punches to the head, even<br />

turned around and tryed to run from the attack but the other woman followed her<br />

and hit her from behind, very hard. She collapsed and later died.Several<br />

men have also been killed in these competitions, because the matches are<br />

lopsided and not regulated safely. It bothers me that the line blurs and good<br />

boxing is lumped together with sideshows like the toughman contests. I have to<br />

admit to watching one on TV---and it was like a train wreck---you know you<br />

shouldn't look but you can't help being interested. |<br />

|9/8/03 05:28:35 PM|Gerry Schultz|Cleveland, Ohio||jgschultz11@msn.com||||9|Have<br />

to disagree with you ,Road'ette. <strong>Jerry</strong> clearly, to me at least, was a better<br />

boxer than Joe, and his combination of aggressive counterpunching and slugging<br />

had Joe behind early in both fights. He made Joe pick it up a gear and put the<br />

less-conditioned <strong>Quarry</strong> away in fightI. A wicked body shot badly hurt <strong>Jerry</strong> in<br />

fight II, or <strong>Jerry</strong> would have had a chance to win by boxing Joe, who he hit<br />

often. Don't agree <strong>Jerry</strong> was better boxer than Ali, especially defensively. I<br />

do think <strong>Jerry</strong> was actually a better athlete, as his 'Superstars' performances<br />

indicate. Ali had a birth defect in his left foot, which hindered him not at all<br />

in the ring, but kept out of other sports, I believe. Guys, can you confirm this<br />

for me?|<br />

|9/9/03 07:35:36 AM|Massimo|Rome||Francesco Damiani better than<br />

Ali'.com||||10|Both Joe Frazier and Earnie Shavers reached the peak of their<br />

careers in 1971. A fight between these two guys, in that year, would have been a<br />

war ! <strong>The</strong> winner ? It's hard to decide but... I have to say Joe !|<br />

|9/9/03 10:52:24 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|I think<br />

Shavers reached his peak much later than 1971---probably around 1977 or even<br />

later. He became a more patient fighter, better conditioned to be effective<br />

later into a fight and able to pace himself. He also overcame management<br />

problems and fought with more determination. In 1971, I think Shavers was more<br />

of a brawler/raw puncher with very limited technique.By the mid to late<br />

70's, he was much more focused and experienced. In a 1971 fight, Frazier would<br />

win by middle round TKO because Earnie would run out of gas. But a 1971 Frazier<br />

vs. a 1977 Shavers might be more interesting. I could see Shavers being much<br />

more selective with his punches, waiting for openings that would allow for bombs<br />

to land on Frazier. I still would have to pick Frazier to pull it out, but with<br />

significantly more problems. But as in any Earnie Shavers bout, he'd have a<br />

punchers chance. If he managed to connect hard on Frazier like Foreman did, you<br />

never know how it would have played out. I think Foreman was much more<br />

relentless. After the first knockdown of Frazier, he became a killer and<br />

started bouncing Joe around the ring. I'm not so sure Shavers could make it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!