15.08.2018 Views

Abstracts Book - IMRC 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• SF5-P061<br />

POLYURETHANE FOAM-PHENOLIC FOAM, A COMPARATIVE LIFE<br />

CYCLE ASSESSMENT<br />

Silvia Paola Venegas Segura 1 , Israel Herrera Orozco 2 , Martha Lilia Dominguez Patiño 1<br />

1 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería,<br />

Mexico. 2 Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medio Ambientales y Tecnológicas, Unidad de<br />

Análisis de Sistemas Energéticos, Spain.<br />

The development or production of any product generates a footprint on the<br />

planet, this footprint can be measured through different methodologies. In this<br />

work, a comparative life cycle analysis was performed on 2 types of different<br />

foams, phenolic foams and polyurethane foams.Phenolic foams are widely used<br />

for floristry, insulating material, even hydroponic crops, however phenols are<br />

toxic substances for humans and the environment. Polyurethane foams also<br />

have various applications, among which its use as insulation material in<br />

construction stands out. Due to its high demand and consumption worldwide,<br />

and the easy accessibility to these products, it was decided to carry out an<br />

evaluation to determine the potential potential impacts generated by the<br />

production of both foams.<br />

A technique that helps measure the environmental impact that is generated<br />

from the development of a product is the Life Cycle Assessment, this<br />

methodology is described in ISO 14040, ISO 14044. This methodology was<br />

applied to the development of 6 polyurethane foams, and 3 phenolic foams.<br />

Life Cycle Inventory was performed according to the methodology proposed by<br />

ISO and the EcoInvent database was used,after that, an specialized software<br />

(SimaPro) was used for obtaining results in different impact categories; Climate<br />

change potential (Global Warming), Acidification, Eutrophication, Ozone<br />

depletion, and Water use.<br />

The 6 polyurethane foams had 6 different concentrations of polyols, and 3 of<br />

them used dye, in the case of the 3 phenolic foams, all had dye and the<br />

concentrations were variable. The results showed that the higher the content of<br />

polyols, phenols or dye, the global warming potential increased. (Developing)<br />

The results obtained from the LCA of the foams helped us determine which<br />

foam has the biggest contribution to important impact categories; Ozone<br />

depletion, Global warming, Eutrophication, acidification and water use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!