15.08.2018 Views

Abstracts Book - IMRC 2018

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• SF7-O008<br />

IMPORTANT PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS FOR MATERIALS<br />

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING`S STUDENTS<br />

Ana Elisa Martinez del Rio 1 , Luis José Yudico Anaya 1 , Luis Alberto Bretado Aragon 1 , Ana Lilian<br />

Rodriguez Villafuerte 2<br />

1 Universidad de La Cienega del Estado de Michoacán de Ocampo, Nanotechnology, Mexico.<br />

2 Instituto de Educación Media Superior del Distrito Federal, Plantel Gustavo A. Madero 2 -<br />

Salvador Allende, Mexico.<br />

The General Courses play a pivotal role in transmitting the fundamental values<br />

(Respect, Responsibility, Honesty, Solidarity,…) and abilities (Critical Thinking,<br />

Metacognition, Teamwork, Mathematical Thinking, Communication skills,…) to<br />

our students. These values and abilities are part of the Vision and Mission of our<br />

university (UCEMICH). Although we have maintained our values and our mission,<br />

over the course of 10 years we have had to adapt the way in which these values<br />

and skills are included in the curriculum. Thanks to the interaction between<br />

pedagogues, philosophers, engineers and scientists we have been able to<br />

introduce some important changes in the classic model of education (lecturecentric<br />

knowledge dissemination). In this work we will review three sets of<br />

strategies to promote three fundamental skills: Critical Thinking, Metacognition<br />

and Written Communication Skills. These three strategies combine various<br />

pedagogical and didactic resources with the philosophical approach of 1)<br />

Aesthetics; 2) Ethics and 3) Politics.One way to summarize the objective of each<br />

of these strategies is through some important philosophical questions that<br />

every science student should be able to face. For example, many people are<br />

concerned about a variety of environmental issues and say that “we” (scientists)<br />

should do “something” about those issues. But what ethical/practical<br />

assumptions underlie this “should”? Can that something be anything? The<br />

answers to this question matter not only because we need to justify our actions,<br />

but because different answers may imply different courses of action. Students<br />

are expected to be autonomous in generating ideas for discussion and arguing<br />

different sides in hypothetical cases in order to elucidate their complexity.<br />

Acknowledgment:<br />

We would like to express our gratitude and appreciation to Professor Juan<br />

Manuel Gutierrez Vazquez. He led an important number of science and<br />

educational projects; among them the creation of our university. He also led a<br />

project in the 1970s to produce free natural science textbooks for all primary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!