02.02.2013 Aufrufe

2 management - School of International Business and ...

2 management - School of International Business and ...

2 management - School of International Business and ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Günter S. Heiduk<br />

This model combines the free trade case <strong>and</strong> the tariff case. Assume that under free trade<br />

country I imports good x at the world market price p(F). After country I introduces a tariff (t<br />

I (F)) for imports from the world market, the domestic price rises to p(F + t), thus reducing<br />

the imports to x I (F + t) x I (F + t)* = x (CU) x (F + t). At this tariff, country II is not compe-<br />

titive: its price plus tariff exceeds the price plus tariff from other countries (p II + t > p (F +<br />

t)). Finally, country I <strong>and</strong> II decide to establish a customs union. Now, country II has free<br />

access to the market in country I, but the latter still protects its market against third coun-<br />

tries by keeping the tariff (t I (CU)). The equilibrium within the customs union is achieved<br />

with an import volume <strong>of</strong> x (CU) x (F + t)) = x I (CU) x I (CU)* = x II (CU) x II (CU)* at the<br />

price p I,II ( CU) . The total trade effect can be divided into:<br />

- trade creation x I (CU) x I (F + t)<br />

- trade expansion x I (F + t)* x I (CU)*<br />

- trade diversion x I (F + t) x I (F + t)*.<br />

The customs union leads to an increase <strong>of</strong> imports at a lower price, but the total imports<br />

<strong>of</strong> country I are now exported from country II instead <strong>of</strong> formerly from third countries. Less<br />

effi cient producers in country II substitute more effi cient producers in third countries. This<br />

effect is characterized as the welfare loss <strong>of</strong> trade diversion (table below).<br />

Note that the negative welfare effect <strong>of</strong> trade diversion is shrinking if the difference bet-<br />

ween the free trade price <strong>and</strong> the price within the customs union is decreasing.<br />

The model <strong>of</strong> an optimum currency area [Mundell, 1961; McKinnon, 1963, Kenen, 1969] is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the main theoretical pillars that form the starting point for integrating the monetary sectors<br />

<strong>of</strong> countries with different currencies. The empirical relevance is growing, not only because an<br />

increasing number <strong>of</strong> regional trade agreements have reached a mature stage but also because<br />

the gravity forces in larger regions without institutionalized trade agreements experience the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> a leading currency. The aforementioned founders <strong>of</strong> the OCA theory addressed<br />

the essential characteristics that determine the supra-national region where exchange rates can<br />

be fi xed <strong>and</strong> eventually replaced by a common currency. It could also be applied to sub-national<br />

regions demonstrating the opposite policy if the common currency does not fulfi ll the OCA criteria.<br />

162

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!