08.05.2013 Views

Volumen II - SAM

Volumen II - SAM

Volumen II - SAM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

damping peak during the cooling (see curves A and D in Figure1), above mentioned. In another hand, it can<br />

be seen from Figure 1 that during the heating runs up to 1250K, the irradiated samples presented a peak<br />

(curves F and H in the Figure) which is composed of more than one elementary relaxation. In fact, in<br />

previous works by analysing the MS results, we showed that the spectrum of deformed molybdenum is<br />

composed by two relaxations; a relaxation at around 800K, hereafter called LTP and another one at around<br />

1000K that we will call HTP [2]. The activation energy we measured for these two relaxations was 1.6eV<br />

and 2.7 - 2.8eV for the LTP and HTP, respectively [2, 6]. Peak temperatures and frequencies data for LTP<br />

and HTP relaxations for irradiated samples, fit very well in the Arrhenius plot we performed before to<br />

calculate the activation energy, H, of the peaks for deformed samples [6] (full symbols and straight lines),<br />

see Figure 6. In this figure the empty circles and square represent the peaks corresponding to the LTP and<br />

HTP, respectively for the irradiated samples. In addition, the peaks promoted by re-irradiation both in <br />

and samples are also in agreement with the Arrhenius plot in Figure 6. Therefore, it can be proposed<br />

that the same physical mechanism is controlling the LTP (H=1.6 eV) and HTP (H=2.7 eV) peaks both in<br />

irradiated and non-irradiated samples. The difference in the peak temperature and intensity should be related<br />

only to a different arrangement of defects on the dislocation lines.<br />

Figure 5. Lower and left axis: Radius of the<br />

agglomerates of vacancies for a sample of (f)<br />

type. Upper and right axis: I vs q curves.<br />

Figure 6. Arrhenius plot for LTP and HTP.<br />

It should be stressed that re-irradiation clearly demonstrates that the interaction of vacancies with<br />

dislocations is the mechanism responsible for the relaxation that appears in deformed and annealed samples<br />

and which stabilises at around 800K, the LTP. Indeed, deformed samples present the peak after annealing in<br />

the cooling run. In a previous work we showed that when the relaxation practically disappears after the<br />

sample is vibrated for a few hours at 1250 K, a new deformation (5% torsion) restores the peak in the cooling<br />

run after annealing [7]. In the re-irradiated sample, see Figure 2, the peak is again restored in the cooling run<br />

after the sample was re-irradiated and heated to 973K, but the sample was not deformed. Here the vacancies<br />

produced after irradiation migrates during the annealing to the dislocations which remains of the previous<br />

deformation and restores the peak.<br />

We showed previously that the intensity of the peak is directly related with the amount of deformation, i.e.<br />

with the dislocation density [6]. Looking at the microstructure of deformed samples it can be seen that<br />

these exhibits a more jogged structure than the samples, in agreement with a larger quantity of<br />

interacting slip systems activated during the tensile test and verified by TEM. In addition, we have found the<br />

evidence of the non-significant effect of the low flux neutron irradiation on the samples. So, the jog<br />

density has to play an important role in the intensity of the peak. Therefore, the LTP relaxation can be related<br />

to the jog drag in the dislocation under movement, i.e., the LTP can be related with the dragging of jogs<br />

assisted by vacancy diffusion.<br />

On the other hand, the intensity of the HTP depends on the amount of deformation and on the number of slip<br />

systems activated by plastic deformation. For the same amount of deformation the peak is higher in <br />

samples than in the , but is not clearly affected by irradiation [2, 6, 7]. The extra amount of vacancies<br />

supplied by the irradiation seems to influence more the background than the relaxation itself [2]. Taking into<br />

account that the self diffusion energy for vacancies, Hsd, can be written as the sum of the formation energy,<br />

1273<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!